Archive for September, 2009

Healing The Damaged Child Within With The Power of Love

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

images-2I had a lovely phone conversation the other day with Eva M. Selhub, MD, a former staff member of Harvard Medical School and author of The Love Response. While we began talking about the healing effects on the body that feelings of love can have, we eventually fell on the topic of narcissism.

“It is impossible for narcissists to love because as children they were not loved,” she said.

I agree with the good doctor. A true narcissistic personality disorder, characterized by a grandiose exterior personality that belies an underside of shame, is a tragic, often perpetual  diagnosis. But short of NPD, there are plenty of people who simply feel unlovable.  Even occasional childhood neglect and abuse can create a current of mistrust in an adult mind. Mistrust of love itself when it finally shines on us in an authentic form.

Three Healing Relationships

Psychologists have identified three relationships that have the power to heal the damaged child within us. The most obvious, of course, is a therapeutic relationship. In the safety of a private and confidential dyad, a therapist can become a container for our most shameful memories and thoughts, and a presence whose consistency can help rewire our brain. The infant inside can imagine that “mommy” will always be wise, stalwart and compassionate — every Tuesday at 3 pm. Consistency is one mechanism for healing.

Another valuable relationship is the one we can have with our own children. If we are able to break the family cycle of family dysfunction and parent our children the way we wished we had been, both parent and child can benefit. Freud called this psychic defense from pain, sublimation. He felt sublimation was one of the most functional ways to deal with emotional injury –  redirecting pain and helping others avoid a similar fate. But the secret mechanism here the very words parents use. Every time a parent encourages, soothes, and assures a young child, words echo in the adult’s head like a long lost parent. Through our ability to give love, we are soothing and consoling ourselves at the same time. It’s really amazing.

Finally, Psychologists give credit to the marital relationship as a powerful healer. If we are fortunate enough to choose a partner who has an ability to fill in some of the gaps of our childhood, we can be fortified. Too often, though, people have a “compulsion to repeat” and we choose the very pattern that injured us in the first place. At other times, even a relatively happy adult relationship can feel absolutely terrifying, especially if happiness and caring is something foreign to the child within us. I encourage you to take some emotional risks in your relationships. To look closely at your tendency to recoil from care or withhold affection — because authentic love can feel scary. Authentic love is not a perpetual happy place, but it is a home for the heart, one that creaks with age, and burns with an internal fire. Love is the thing that makes us whole.

Dates and Diaper Changes – The Secret Similarities Between Love and Parenting

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

images-1Kids can be challenging. So, can our adult love relationships. But are they the same relationship? In many ways they are, and what we learn from one kind of relationship, we can apply to the other. The common link is emotional intimacy and the big tug-o-war in every intimate relationship is the struggle between independence and union. While many people have heard of co-dependence, that pop psyche term that means no one can remember whose problem is whose, not many fully understand the feeling of a healthy inter-dependence.

Independence and union are the yin-yang of human connections. Being in union with another fills us up with feelings of security, confidence, and heals our loneliness. And sometimes being together can also feel more like suffocation and imprisonment. Independence can help us feel powerful, free, and proudly self-sufficient. But independence can also bring feelings of isolation, fear, and, with no cheer leader, insecurity.

Every intimate relationship is a live action game, it’s partners on the same team with (hopefully) a common goal. Like basketball, sometimes one partner runs with the ball and scores, and other times is happy to assist or play defense. You steer the parent/child team when you make a firm rule. Your child steers the team when his/her unadulterated insight blurted out at a family dinner, awes and amazes you, and you change your behavior based on it. In an adult relationship, you may choose to lead by instituting firm boundaries between work life, couple-hood, and family life. He leads when you all move to a new city for his job and know that the long-run win will be family harmony.

The biggest difference between parenting and adult love is the direction separation runs. When you meet a stranger and fall in love, your journey together is one where you continue to grow closer and closer to create deep intimacy. A mother/child relationship runs the opposite course. You begin, literally as one body. And your journey is a long, slow separation from womb to dorm room. Both kinds of relationships share this: on their journey together each partner’s needs for closeness and autonomy will wax and wane as emotional needs ride the waves of daily life stresses.

Some people might think that another huge difference is that kids can’t leave. They are wholly dependent on their parents. But I beg to differ. Although kids may be financially dependent on their parents, they can emotionally leave the relationship. They can check out if their well-timed calls for some  autonomy are not heeded. They can check out if they are given too much independence, and feel unprotected by their parents. Lovers can do the same thing. They may leave physically or emotionally.

So, how can we honor the struggle between our desires to be an individual and our desires to be a partner? The answer is always to talk about it. To have empathy for another’s autonomy and not “take it personally.” To voice our own needs for autonomy or closeness in a non-threatening way. The road to intimacy is a prickly path. We will often make mistakes in judgement, or act from a place of fear. But the other wonderful thing about all relationships is that they are alive and growing and there is always room for repair. And in that very process of repair, where we may use empathy and humor, we will feel in union again, that is, until the next time we feel smothered.


The Elephant in Our Relationships

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

6a00d83451bc4a69e2011168fab78b970c-800wi I like to say that relationships are more often about the elephant in the living room than the tiger in the bedroom. That elephant can be ignored all day long, but he’s still in the living room. And his name is emotional intimacy. However,  couples unknowingly do talk about the elephant all day long in metaphors, gestures, touch and facial expressions — round about ways of asking for love.

Drs. John and Julie Schwartz Gottman, marriage researchers and therapists would probably agree with me. Their ground breaking work on couples communication styles and partner’s bids for connection shows that long term marital happiness can be connected to the husband’s ability to respond to his wife’s bids for closeness. In recording data from an “apartment” laboratory, psychologist Gottman discovered that mundane conversations contain many bids for emotional connection — sometimes as many as 100 bids in ten minutes. “These bids can be a question, a look, an affectionate touch on the arm or any single expression that says, “I want to feel connected to you,” says Gottman. “A response to a bid can be a turn toward, away or against someone’s request for emotional connection.”

For example, consider a man who comes home from work and his wife says, “How was your day?” There are many ways to pose the question that run the gamut from sarcastic “How was YOUR day (implying that hers was worse) to a sweet, earnest inquiry to know more about a lover. And there are many ways to respond. From a curt “Fine,” to a “Great, honey! How was yours?” Add to that simple exchange, body language, facial expression and physical touch, and you can see that couples, even when they are saying nothing, are often saying a lot.

And an ability to turn toward or away from a request can even predict divorce. Research from Gottman’s apartment lab showed that husbands who eventually were divorced ignored the bids from their wives 82 percent of the time compared to 19 percent for men in stable marriages. Women who later divorced ignored their husband’s bids 50 percent of the time while those who remained married only disregarded 14 percent of their husband’s bids.

In the lab and in the therapy room, Dr. Gottman has discovered that many people are emotionally aware, that they lack emotional literacy in being able to read the emotional message in facial expressions or voice tone. And this handicap leads the other partner to feel rejected. The good news is that Gottman believes these skills can be learned, and even couples on the brink can find ways back into love.

Find out More: http://www.gottman.com/research

The Gottman Institute™ applies leading-edge research on marriage in a practical, down-to-earth therapy and trains therapists committed to helping couples.

Are You Headed For Divorce? Find Out Here.

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

imagesFifty per cent. Yep. It’s no secret that the divorce rate is 50% in America. And that’s for first marraiges. Second marriages have a 67% divorce rate, according to Psychology Today. Clearly, that’s a sobering statistic if you’re sitting at your desk pondering the knock down, drag ‘em out, war of words that you had with your spouse last night. Every married person who hits a rough patch has the same thought pattern. Are we headed for divorce? When is enough, enough?

Well, now social researchers have answered those questions for us. There are a plethora of statistics out that they can help predict divorce. But before I break down some of the research for you, there are also a couple things you should know about statistics. First statistics are really helpful to determine trends but they mostly look backwards. So, simply saying that something has a statistical probability doesn’t mean it’s a given. It means that’s what happened to a significant amount of similar people before.

And there’s one other huge thing about statistics. They rarely look at causality. Most divorce studies compare two factors, like age of marriage and divorce rate, but that doesn’t mean that being young causes divorce. Making stupid decisions in Vegas when you are 23 might lead to a rocky marriage, but plenty of other factors in that rocky marriage get the blame for the break up. Make sense? So, with that disclaimer, here’s the Dr. Wendy Walsh divorce test. If you answer “yes” to most of the questions below, you have a statistical probability of getting divorced:

1. Was your courtship less than one year?

2. Did you live together before marriage?

3. Were either of your parents divorced?

4. Is this your husband’s second marriage?

5. Do you make more money than the husband?

6. Do you keep separate bank accounts?

7. When you fight, do either of you blame, defend or stonewall?

8. Does the husband need to “win” most arguments?

9. Were either of you under the age of 25 when you got married?

10. Do you practice different religions?

11. Are your family and friends unsupportive of the marriage?

12. Do either of you have a heart rate increase and breathing pattern change right before you discuss a conflict?

Again, let me reiterate. A high score doesn’t mean you are guaranteed to spend some heart wrenching days in divorce court. This data might suggest, however, that your marriage may need a little more attention and TLC than others. Some marriages are more vulnerable but no less functional. And sometimes doing the work to keep the marriage strong is just the kind of personal growth both partners need. Marriage therapy can give partners so many tools to help them combat all the struggles that face couples today, and at any stage of a marriage, learning new relationship tools can only make us better people.

There’s one thing that causes every divorce: One or both partners failing to do the work of intimacy and connection. The more intimacy both partners have, the more empathy. The more empathy and understanding, the more fair the fighting — and the more honest the love. And the greater commitment.

Honey I Shrunk the Argument. But Can We All Do It?

Monday, September 28th, 2009

imagesOne of my blog readers sent me this article from CNN.com, written by Gretchen Reynolds at Oprah.com. It’s called “Honey I Shrunk the Argument.” It’s about lab research on couples’ conflict being done by Lisa Diamond, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Utah. In Lisa’s lab, couples are hooked up to monitors that record heart rate, respiration changes, and electrical currents that flow across their skin. These indicators of nervous system activity are charted as couples engage in arguments.

The big take away is this: Empathy and humor, are hugely restorative.

Specifically, when a man withdraws during a fight, his nervous system relaxes but his frustrated female partner gets more intense. If she can imagine that he can’t respond, that his withdrawal is his way of coping, and instead focus on her own breathing and heart rate, she’ll calm down and he’ll be able to come out of his shell.

As for humor, the researchers found that  laughter during an argument can help people find their way back into love. Couples who eventually giggle, most often leave the research room holding hands.

For the rest of us, who don’t have expensive electrical monitors and lab technicians to offer feedback, our arguments could benefit from a practice of focussing on our internal body awareness. The next time you feel angry, feel your heart. Listen to your breathing. Then, close your eyes and feel your brain waves. Get control over the congestion before you utter another word.

And then think of the last time you had an all out belly laugh. Yes, go to your happy place. Mine happens to be on a bus in the Canary Islands with two moms, six kids, a smelly fish and a poopie diaper. I still laugh out loud when I think of this.


Compassion, the New Fashion?

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

compassionCompassion is a theme that keeps cropping up in my life these days.

On Friday, I had to give a negative reward to my daughter when she failed to show compassion to a houseguest.

Last night I thought of compassion again. I had just finished finished reading “The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao,” by Pulitzer Prize winning author Junot Diaz, and was watching a “talk” by him on YouTube. When asked about his challenges as a professor of literature at MIT, Diaz told his audience that his biggest job is to teach compassion. He says, “You don’t get to MIT by being a compassionate person.”

This morning I was at cooking school. Mediterranean week.  Amidst the pilaf and the hummus and the stuffed grape leaves, I met a psychologist who, besides cooking, specializes in couples therapy. When I asked her about her psychological theory, she said she mixes Buddhist thought into her traditional psycho-dynamic therapy. Buddhist ideas for couples in crisis? What do you teach them, to be patient and wait? No, she says, mostly I teach compassion.

Compassion. I looked it up.

“The humane quality of understanding the suffering of others and wanting to do something about it.”

Unlike empathy, a feeling also prompted by the pain of others, compassion has an added bonus — it gives rise to action. Compassion is about understanding another’s challenges, pain, and suffering, AND actively trying to improve their situation. Compassion improves all relationships.

Now that we are in a recession and less busy charging through lines at Costco and stepping on each other’s toes, compassion seems to be in fashion. The Obamas have instituted national days of service and as we all head into a holiday season, projected to be leaner than most, we may be reminded of the true meaning of the holidays. Most religions celebrate light in the darkest days of winter and incorporate a theme of remembering those less fortunate — and doing something about it.

But what about our most intimate relationships?  Our love relationships? I will be so bold as to declare that compassion is the very essence of love. Compassion is the trait we showcase when we are attracting a partner and falling in love. Compassion is the magic dust we sprinkle on our fights to help us repair the damage. And compassion is the glue that keeps couples together when the going gets boring and the grass next door looks neon.

Compassion works on us too. Compassion is the feeling we can use to love ourselves more. To accept our own flawed path and ill-timed lessons of life. When we can feel compassion for ourself, that is, understand our own suffering and do something to heal it, then we have so much more to give in a love relationship.

So the next time you find yourself at an impasse with love, stop and entertain the feeling of compassion. Are you being too hard on yourself? Are you being too hard on that other human being in your life? Dig deep at these moments to scoop from the geyser of compassion that flows inside every person. Compassion is the only thing that works every time.


Love Isn’t Something you Find. It’s Something You Do!

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

6492_123478201833_115788661833_3006332_1609785_aThere’s a strange misconception going on in our culture and I’d like to clear it up right now so we can all get on with our lives. There seems to be this idea that finding a partner with whom we can exchange mutual care, is about finding a perfect match — a soul mate. This idea has fueled the entire dating industry that includes websites, TV shows, and every romantic comedy that’s ever been written. And this idea of romantic love has also caused many divorces when partners become disappointed that their marriage isn’t filled with “love.”

But let me say it loud and clear: Love isn’t something you search for. Love is something you actively create. You are in the driver’s seat. And you can direct your love on anyone you choose. Need proof? Look at this statistic. There are far more arranged marriages in the world than marriages based on romantic love. The divorce rate for marriages based on love is over 50% and for second marriages based on love the divorce rate is much higher. However, worldwide, the divorce rate in arranged marriages is 4%. Part of this success is due to the cultural factors that help glue the relationship and another part of it is the intellectual commitment made by each partner. But knowing this. Let me ask you, why not arrange your own marriage?

Granted, we are not attracted to everyone we meet. Sexual attraction, which is quite different from love, is a hypnotic cocktail of brain stimuli responding to vision, sound, and pheromones. Each of us has a unique mix of memories from our sexual development that merge together to create our version of a sexually attractive person. But, let’s now ask anyone reading this: Are you sexually attractive in a very narrow group of people. Of course not! We would never have survived as a species if our wiring was so narrowly directed. There are many, many potential partners out there for all of us, both men and women.

Being an active lover means having compassion and empathy for another person and adjusting your behavior to accommodate them. That doesn’t mean having no boundaries and being a doormat. But it also doesn’t mean bailing when the first hint of conflict arises. Love is a decision, not a quest.

I’ll bet if you adjusted your mindset, you could find love today. Hint: It’s all in your head.

Are Facebook Friends Real?

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

When E.M. Forster wrote the famous line in Howards End, “Only connect,” I wonder if he could have envisioned the phenomenon of Facebook.

woman using laptop computer

Dr. Wendy Walsh: Like most of you, when I first logged onto the site, I felt nervous. This was a new social world with blurry rules of conduct. The lack of boundaries and potential for social and business gaffs was intimidating. The instant access to and from people who crossed our paths in a station of life where we no longer reside, was a strange event. (Yes, I have received some sheepish apologies and sent some myself.)

I’d always mistrusted technology. It felt like a detached form of communication. What with the time lag, the lack of voice tone and body language, who could really know what was being said, anyway? Add to that the mass distribution of personal blurbs, and this whole thing felt inauthentic. Were we all just narcissists jumping on our own soapbox looking for our 15 minutes in our small pond? And what of those whose ponds had become lakes and oceans — the non-celebrity Facebook users who have thousands of “friends”? How could that be a connection? E.M. Forster also wrote this in Howards End: “I believe we shall come to care about people less and less, Helen. The more people one knows the easier it becomes to replace them.”

I watched my news feed for weeks, frozen with thoughts of how and why.

Then I jumped in. Gingerly, at first. A few personal status reports. Then the creation of a separate Facebook page to bring my brand into the social networking world. Yes, I admit, it was commercial motivations that helped me see the light.

Then events started to take place in my life and I realized that I had been wrong about Facebook. It is a huge way to connect in a real way, about real stuff.

First, I was at a real-world party and I saw Linda Thompson, a woman I have known briefly in the early 90s when I interviewed an Academy Award winner and her then-husband. Back then, we had connected over a shared interest in helping disadvantaged youth. But the overlap in our lives was not large enough, and we soon swam away into our different parts of the ocean. Almost two decades later, I would never have approached her to say hello at the party, except that we had become Facebook friends and I wanted to compliment her on the promotion she does for her son and his TV show. Now, when she posts things along the lines of: Brody Jenner had recently felt lonely in a Toronto hotel room and caught a commercial for a non-profit dedicated to kids in Africa and immediately called to donate money, I feel connected. I know where his heart is, for I once witnessed his mother’s heart. And my feelings were not inauthentic.

Sometimes Facebook feels like a friendly connection that transforms our anonymous city into a village. Yesterday morning, I read a post from John Fanaris, a father at my children’s school. John is a big wine guy with a cellar I am completely envious of. His wife, Noelle, is a super chef, so I am doubly envious. John had posted a status report that he would be dining with friends who were also big wine and food enthusiasts, and asked his Facebook friends for suggestions of what to uncork that evening. Later that afternoon, I was sitting alone in an outdoor cafe, coincidentally reading Food & Wine magazine, and I heard my name called out. I looked up to see the entire Fanaris family trotting in from the beach. I waved and said, “Have you decided on which wine yet, John?” A Facebook conversation had moved seamlessly into the real world, sans a time lag.

Sometimes Facebook is a practical connection. A virtual parent. One day when I couldn’t reach my 11-year-old daughter on her cell phone, I sent her a Facebook status report because I had an intuition she was “Facebooking” on her iPod touch. She got back to me quickly.

At other times, Facebook is a tragic connection. A few months ago, a former co-worker from KCOP Channel 13 in Los Angeles, Lisa Sanders, had “friended” me. We exchanged a few nice reconnection e-mails. She complimented me on my growing, healthy kids. We asked about other mutual co-workers. Then last week, Lisa suddenly died of a stroke. I would never have known that, had I not been on Facebook. News of her funeral was posted on her page. Her wall is now filled with touching goodbyes from all her friends, including me. Her Facebook page has become an electronic monument to a sweet woman who died too soon. And the tears that swelled in my eyes when I read the news on Facebook were real.

So, I take it back. Facebook is an addicting addition to all our human connections. We seek out the comfort of another’s company and empathy to stave off loneliness. We do it in the real world with our lovers and families, and we do it electronically because it feels good to be seen and heard, and to know that we can be a part of the lives of so many.

“One must be fond of people and trust them if one is not to make a mess of life.” — E.M. Forster

Reposted from MomLogic.com

Romantic Comedies vs. Real Life Love

Friday, September 25th, 2009

DownloadedFileScreenwriter Denis Faye wrote this piece for the Writer’s Guild of America website. He interviewed me and asked me to compare celluloid love with the real kind. If you’re a fan of romantic comedies, which I am, you might be interested to read this.

http://www.wga.org/content/default.aspx?id=3804

From Happily Nesting to Happily Married – How to Get A Real Commitment

Friday, September 25th, 2009

images-3This is one email I get over and over. It’s from the gal who’s living happily with a great boyfriend in a comfy nest and is now ready to get married. Of course, like most healthy men who know a good thing when they have it, her boyfriend would rather see Pittsburgh win another Super Bowl than have that conversation. With permission of the sender, here’s an example of just such email:

Good Morning Dr. Walsh!

It’s a fairly common story: girl meeets boy, both fall in love, move in together and two years later there is still no engagement ring. I love my boyfriend very much, and part of me believes that my best bet in this situation is to be very buddhist, and resign myself to a happy life in the present. But on the other hand I want kids. I know my boyfriend loves me an incredible amount, we’re perfect together, and make each other genuinely happy every day. How do I get him to realize what he has, without being counteractive and harping on him all the time?

- (Anonymous)

Before I share with you my brutal response to this unwitting young woman, let me explain my theory. Men are wired differently than women. Most women are anthropologically wired to be very, very selective when choosing a mate. In our ancient history and our not-so-ancient history, women could literally starve if they chose a bad provider or have their offspring die if they chose someone with weak genes. So in today’s version of the female selection game, some people use the term finding a Soul Mate. (That’s one I hate, but that’s for another blog.) It’s just a metaphor for being selective.

Men, on-the-other-hand, have to choose between spreading their seed and focussing on one nest. And, let me tell ya, spreading the seed is a whole lot more fun. However, survival odds are better (for the man and his babies) if he invests in one woman most of the time.

In our more modern evolution, marriage is a cultural invention designed to keep widows and children off the public doles. Although it’s all wrapped up with religion and the law, it’s mostly a response to our shift from hunting and gathering to farming. Back when women gathered, they were more likely to survive if abandoned, however, if they were trapped on forty acres of land with a deadbeat and no birth control, things got dicey. So, “society” stepped in and gave women a contract: Marriage. Today that contract has become a giant industry. (But that’s also for another blog.)

Most men will stay single until they reach their own personal state of readiness. That state of readiness can be created through social pressure, age, achievement of financial security, and lack of access to wombs. No one can predict a man’s state of readiness, but I promise you this, when he hits that place of readiness, he’s going to pitch to whomever is up at bat. He may have had better girlfriends in his past. He may be foregoing better wives in his future. But when he’s ready to marry, he’s going to marry. Period.

All a live-in girlfriend, is to focus on her own goals and gently prod a state of readiness in him. And be prepared that her prodding may backfire. Now, here’s my answer to that woman. I warn my male readers, you may hate me for this advice:

Sorry to break the news to you, my wonderful girlfriend in the love trenches. But the first mistake already happened. Couples who live together before marriage have a much higher divorce rate. But if you want to give it a stab anyway, do it with one clear statement and a deadline.

Men won’t respond to words. You must use action. Tell him clearly how you feel. Find a date that is 90-180 days away and make plans to move out on that date. If it works, he’ll come back to you with a proposal. If it doesn’t work, you’ll lose a good boyfriend. But that doesn’t mean you lost a potential husband. If he can’t step up to the plate, you’d like to know that before your eggs go stale, right? I know too many women in their forties who stayed Buddhist and are childless today.

Just some advice from one wise woman to another. The Doctor in me can only ethically suggest that you seek a professional therapist as a counselor.:)