Archive for October, 2009

The Psychology of Hooking Up

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

imagesI have a friend named Ilana. She and I have opposing romantic attachment styles. Ilana is what many people might call independent. She has her own money, her own house, and her own rules. While she has loving, intimate relationships with men, before long, her boyfriend-du-jour starts to feel like he’s smothering her. Then she begins to describe her once heart-throb, as clingy. She says he hangs around her place too much. She asks him to go away so she can miss him. And ya know what? Rather than bolting with his tail between his legs, her sweet, hurt, puppy boyfriend usually becomes even more attentive to her needs, until she can’t take it anymore and banishes him forever. Good-bye another in a line of sweet hunks.

I’ve never met these kind of men. They apparently are not attracted to me. Or, they are invisible to me. One or the other. The men in my life follow an inconsistent advance/retreat pattern, that alternatively feels blissful and rejecting. They walk to their own testosterone drum and shower me with brief periods of love and then disappear for an indeterminate amount of time, while I drum my fingers, watch the clock, and act like I don’t care.

One evening Ilana and I were out doing what women do best, walking and talking. The moon was high and the Pacific ocean thundered nearby, and we were thundering on about our latest boy problems. I posed the question that maybe we deliberately choose the kind of men we choose just to act out some kind of early life conflict. Hers having to do with engulfment, mine having to do with abandonment. In other words, our very smart brains sniff out the future and we become attracted to the very thing that makes us sick. Kinda like a food allergy. We debated that idea for a while.

Then I came up with an even better theory. (Well, I came up with it late. Real researchers had already figured this out.) What if we don’t choose specific guys with some kind of chick voodoo, but instead, perceive them to be whatever we need to bitch about. In other words, what if we were both actually dating the same kind of man, yet it felt different to each of us? And better yet, what if how we behaved to this similar man, caused him to react in the exact bad way that we needed? In other words, since we expect a kind of behavior, we do whatever it takes to get him to act out what we need, even if what we seem to need, hurts us a lot. Wow. That was a brain twister. Of course, I can’t exactly prove this theory without sleeping with one of Ilana’s boyfriends, but I do have some psychological theory to prove that my hunch is accurate. It’s called attachment theory. In the next few blogs I will break down attachment theory for you, so you can see your own stories unfold as a research statistic. Stay tuned.

Where the Wild Things Scar

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

images-1There’s a line early on in Spike Jonze‘ brilliant, Where The Wild Things Are that sums up the premise of the entire movie. Angry, confused and neglected 7-year-old Max is reciting a story about Vampires to his overwhelmed, single mother.

“The Vampire bites off the top off a building and loses his teeth. Another Vampire says, ‘Why are you crying? Those are your baby teeth.’ And he says, ‘No they’re not. They’re my adult teeth.”

Not two scenes later, Max, in a fit of rage, actually bites his own mother and runs, terrified, into the wilds of his own psyche, meeting face-to-face his internal demons of rage, self-criticism, fear, shame, and self-destruction, all in the form of adorable, animated monsters. Eventually they also show him hope and love. Only when he loses his crown as head of the wild things does he help them (him) integrate and self regulate, so can he sail back into his conscious world, ready to cut his adult teeth.

“Wild Things” is perhaps the most unusual and most visceral depiction of our emotional journey that has ever made it to the screen. We all walk with wild things inside of us. And we flirt with the fear that they have the power to consume us. Psychologists sometimes say that we all have a psychotic core, a deep internal state of madness that most of us learn to tame. It is only a tiny percentage of humans who are overtly psychotic, however, psychotic feelings are pieces of many emotional states and mental disorders.

I took my six-year-old to Where The Wild Things Are when it opened yesterday, thinking because it was based on the classic children’s book, that it would be a movie for children. While I don’t think the film is inappropriate for children, I do think that adults will get far more out of it than kids. It has many levels of understanding and there is clearly something for everyone.

My own child has been prone to uncontrollable tantrums since she was born. She’s kicked it now. It’s been a couple weeks (says the hopeful junkie’s mother.) As she and I watched Max’s rage, through his own eyes, an understandable outcome of the trauma he was experiencing. And then felt the double injury –punishment for the destruction he caused. I hugged my own little Wild Thing and asked her if that’s what it feels like to be struck in a tantrum. She did not take her eyes off Max as she whispered, “Yep. Sort of like that.”

The metaphor about baby teeth and adult teeth was so poignant to me. While we may physically grow out of childhood, we do not grow out of our feelings. They morph into adult behaviors and dysfunctions and quietly keep us from trusting each other, trusting love, and living to our fullest potential. We would all do well to have a chat with our wild things, and like Max, learn to tame them, rather than ignore them.

Manufacturerd Sperm! Are Men Becoming Extinct?

Friday, October 16th, 2009

6492_119164371833_115788661833_2926283_5715708_nDON’T TELL MEN THIS! But, they are about to become extinct. I know, I know. This is startling news for me to receive, too. Because, I like men. I mean, I really, really like men, and the thought of living on a man-less planet is kinda creepy. But here are the facts, according to some forward thinking biologists. We recently learned to manufacture sperm.

Women have very intelligent bodies. Our double X chromosome protect us from many diseases because if we inherit a deadly disorder on one side of our X chain, there’s a good chance we have a healthy back-up X to compensate. We also express more genes overall than males, who have one X and one Y. The X chromosome – one of 24 chromosomes found in human cells – is much larger than the relatively puny Y (sorry guys, size, apparently, does matter). Our X contains 1,098 genes to the Y’s 78.

This means that female mammals contain over 1,000 more genes than males. To compensate for this, the female body switches off one X chromosome – quite randomly – in each cell. Men often fall victim to diseases carried on the X chromosome because they don’t have a back-up copy of the gene on the second chromosome. Poor babies. More than 300 conditions have been linked to the X chromosome so far, from heart disease to cancers, but since us gals have another – usually healthy – copy of the X chromosome, we are shielded from the full impact of these disorders. Now multiply that fact by about one-hundred thousand years of dating, mating and procreating and you start to see how men might become an endangered species.

So there’s the writing on the wall that men may be on their way out. Add to this chromosome problem, the facts that male premature infants are less likely to survive, and the fact that, well, the male lifespan is shorter, and the picture becomes clearer.

A few years ago, I sat on an airplane beside a young, handsome, smart, version of an XY chromosome and he spelled it out for me. He could do this because he was a human biology professor in Great Britain. And he spelled it out with such a lovely English accent. I told him I was writing a book about feminine intelligence and I asked him to give me his opinion on the intelligence of women’s biology. He just shrugged his shoulders and said, “Well, for starters, it’s been calculated that in 125,000 years men will be extinct.”

I laughed at that. “Don’t you mean that the entire human species will be extinct then?”

He looked at me with a stone cold stare and calmly stated, “This week the first human infant was born using frozen sperm and a frozen egg. Don’t you think that in 125,000 years, you girls will have figured out how to make sperm for yourself?”

Apparently, this year we did. Use it wisely, girls.

Ladies, Please Shag Responsibly.

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

imagesFree sex is here to stay. If you are a card-carrying member of the new millennium Girls Club, you are probably sexually active in an age where the double standard has all but disappeared. Unlike your grandmothers, you don’t have to worry about getting a bad reputation, getting pregnant, or getting caught. You’ve got your own apartment now. And you’ve got the education and good sense to practice safer forms of sex. So, why not go for it every time? I mean, guys usually do.

For one big reason, ladies: No one has removed the emotional risks of sex.

First of all, know this — in terms of a biological sex drive, men and women are wired very similarly. We all love sex. In this area we have much in common. Now, if, you believe that most women must have an emotional connection before having sex, and that most men act on physical desire alone, then you’re reciting cultural conventions, not biological realities. Your thinking has been programmed by a culture that is still dragging along some pre-sexual revolution remnants. The bottom line: You too, can have great no-strings-attached sex. But SHOULD you? My simple answer is, not always. We are wired like men, but being liberated women isn’t about acting just like men. It’s about being something, well, something higher.

Now when I speak about being something higher than our cultural perception of a Don Juan, I’m not talking about being prudish, virtuous, or about being a good girl. I’m talking about being a bad girl with boundaries. I’m talking about being a bad girl with feelings. I’m talking about learning to have great sex that not only produces an earth shattering orgasm but also verges on a spiritual experience. Let me explain more through these four questions.

1. Is more always better?

While I believe that a healthy dose of sexual experience is a great thing to cart into your next relationship, too much sex with too many partners doesn’t make you any better at it, especially if your problem isn’t sex, but intimacy. Intimacy is that strange and wonderful catch-word that describes emotional closeness, the ability to be honest, open, and vulnerable with another person. Too much unconscious sex only makes intimacy harder to achieve. Trust me. I’ve tried it. People used to tell me that I practiced sex like a man, and they were right. It was only when I learned to act like a gentleman that I began to get it right.

2. Is a man who is delicious on the outside always so delectable on the inside?

I know there is a resounding NO! being screamed at computer screens right now. We’ve all been there, girlfriends. Remember the major babe, Prince Charming who turned out to be a Frog after we kissed him? Of course, the sexual experience may still have been great, but getting back to that thinking-feeling-conscious-woman thing, I ask you this — Was that yummy action between the sheets really worth the let down that you felt when you found out the guy was actually, married, a convict, a recluse, a gambler, a drug addict, a compulsive liar, a defendant in a paternity suit, a domestic abuser or a serial killer? So, my advice? Don’t have sex. Take some time with it first. Do your guerrilla research and determine if this guy really deserves your Goddess-like sexual favors.

3. Is it possible to get so hung up on physical attraction that a girl could lose sight of what constitutes a good Boyfriend?

It sure is. We all know women who put looks at the top of their list of important boyfriend traits. Maybe you’re one of them. I certainly used to be. Okay, I admit, it’s a personal battle I struggle with everyday. But I’m getting better. Men’s brains are becoming very sexy to me since surviving a string of hard bodies who were hard to live with. So, my advice when dealing with a major hunk of a date. Don’t sleep with him! It’ll cloud your judgment. Smart men learned this lesson a long time ago. Read: Men never forget the bikini model who got drunk and then got them arrested.

4. As women who are evolving spiritually, emotionally, and intellectually, do we have a responsibility to protect men from themselves?

Men are victims of this patriarchal culture too. Believe it or not, many men feel pressured to put out. They feel it’s their duty to perform for every sexually liberated woman who will have them — even if they don’t really want to have sex. I know you may be groaning at that statement, but please believe me. Some men aren’t even aware of the pressure they’re under. Sure they recognize performance anxiety, but few really know when to say No to sex. It’s your job to do it for them.

Your sexual confidence is an unfair advantage to men. Think of a much older man who seduces a naive 18-year-old girl. There is a power imbalance there. She thinks she wants to have sex, but is this a fair emotional match? Men are sometimes like that young women when faced with a powerful liberated sexual woman. Now think of any man who used the “L” word on you just to get you to have sex with him. Was that fair? So is it fair to use your sexually liberated self to get a man to give up the booty, when you know you might hurt his feelings later? Hell no. The first time a man accused me of playing him, I felt it was a badge of honor. I had attained full equity with the boys club. Now I’m embarrassed that I ever thought those club rules were valuable.

So, be responsible girlfriend. Shag responsibly. Protect the hearts of the nice guys out there. Believe me, men fall hard when their heart breaks. When in doubt, look to your higher self. Welcome to the club of Bad Girls who Think!

Nursing Mothers Make Women Randy (It’s true!)

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

images-2When I was giving birth to my first child, at a very pro-breastfeeding hospital, the labor nurse assigned to my moans told me that she had been through labor seven times. She had actually been pregnant ten times, counting the miscarriages. I was astounded by this woman’s stamina in this day and age, and dismissed her life choice as a hazard of being “in the business.” I mean, I also have a friend who creates packaging for cosmetic companies, and as a result, her bathroom is brimming with baskets of products. No different from this woman’s baskets of babies, I thought. Until I ran across this fascinating headline:

SMELLS ASSOCIATED WITH BREASTFEEDING ARE A NATURAL APHRODISIAC, HEIGHTENING AROUSAL IN OTHER WOMEN

I immediately clicked through to read more about this interesting study. I had worried it was a hoax put out by new fathers trying to get their guy friends laid. But it was for real. Martha McClintock and her team of psychologists at The University of Chicago did a double blind study, where pads soaked in sweat and breast milk were wiped on the upper lips of a study group every day (including after washing or eating) for three months. A control group unknowingly used a dummy wipe. And guess what? Those who had the real-deal, sweat-soaked pads found that their desire for their partner had risen by 42 percent. Single women in the study reported an increase in sexual day dreams.

The researchers hope this groundbreaking data will help them develop treatments for a low sex drive in women. Unlike men, whose sexual dysfunction is most often impotence that can be treated withViagra, women’s sexual dysfunction is more often related to low desire. And this has been very, very difficult to treat.

Pheromones are the key ingredient, according to this study. They are defined as natural compounds produced by one member of a social group that can regulate neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying behavior, fertility, or development in ANOTHER group. In plain speak, that means that people’s subtle or strong smells can change behavior in other people.

Let’s think about why the sexy smells of breastfeeding moms might have been anthropologically selected for in our evolution. First, in a peer group of young women, these pheromones would have signaled to their own bodies that it was time to reproduce, and that they were in an environment where food was plentiful. And human infants have always survived better when caregiving is shared, so having babies with friends was historically a good survival strategy. The modern-day version of this is the evolution of mommy and me baby groups.

It all makes sense to me — and what a fun bonus to a modern woman who uses birth control. So, have I ever mentioned that I give talks on mother-infant attachment and would LOVE to come to your breastfeeding support group? Just saying.

Read more: http://www.momlogic.com/2009/10/want_to_raise_your_libido_hang_out_with_a_breast-feeder.php#ixzz0TxPfZZRG

Two Faced People. Healthy or Dangerous?

Monday, October 12th, 2009

public-private-personalities-250Dr. Wendy Walsh: Let me start by assuring everyone of one thing. We all have two (at least) personalities, and that’s perfectly healthy. In order to survive in our very complex social system, humans learn to put on a public personality that excels at sandbox skills. It’s the face we bring to work with us. I like to call it our “performance personality.”

However, at home, we are more intimate with the natives — and our authentic self, complete with tears and tempers, is allowed to thrive. Thus, our intimate relationships are a home for the heart. It’s a place where the real “us” feels safe.

But when do these dual operating systems become dysfunctional? When is being two-faced bad? Well, our two faces become dangerous when the differences are extreme — when our morals, ethics, and boundaries completely disappear as our private personality begins to rule the roost. This can be particularly damaging to children who become very confused by witnessing two sets of values. In intimate relationships, we may have a shorter temper and more visible sadness, but we shouldn’t have completely different values. If lying and cheating is something you’d never do at work, doing those things privately can be a tragic lesson for kids.

For example, you may not exactly love your boss, but at work and at public functions, you are the picture of the perfect employee — for understandable political gain. But at home, all you do is trash your boss. What is the message to your family members? That mean gossip is okay? That your authentic feelings of hurt are less important than your desire to criticize him or her? Wouldn’t it be more helpful to children to hear a more balanced view of both your boss and you?

Another time that a performance personality can be dysfunctional is when it starts to take over at home — when some great career success comes with many accolades. Those compliments can serve toboost self-esteem — which is good — or they can serve to create falseness. In the entertainment world, when an actor suddenly has a hit movie and begins to live an unbridled life with a huge sense of entitlement, people whisper that “he believes his own press.” So, taking in compliments for your achievements is generally good, but living a false identity to match them is not.

Finally, our private, intimate personality can be dangerous too. If your private personality is more than the odd expression of anger and sorrow, and instead one of severe pain to your family members, then it’s time to get help. If your private personality is one of chronic depression, poor anger management, substance abuse, or even violence, then it’s time to drag that private self to therapy. Here’s a suggestion: Have your public self make the appointment and drive you there.

Read more: http://www.momlogic.com/2009/10/two_faced_people_when_public_and_private_personalities_are_dangerous.php#ixzz0TmcaSoNK

The Rise of The Metrosexual

Monday, October 12th, 2009

images-1Dr. Wendy Walsh: Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fairest guy of all? The incarnation of the American male known as a “metrosexual” is an interesting phenomenon in our culture. Men now buy products called “Dye for Guys,” “High Performance Tanner,” and “Power Skin Lift.” And many of them spend more time in front of the mirror and at waxing studios than women ever did. So what’s going on here? Why are straight guys so consumed with their looks?

Invented by part capitalism and part feminism — those incestuous bedfellows who thrive on dependency and dysfunction — “metrosexuals” are both big business and social science.

Let’s start with capitalism. In the 1980s, when cosmetic companies looked to expand their market in an already saturated world of potions and lotions, men were the obvious next level choice. (Children came next, but that’s a whole other blog!) So, beginning in the late 1980s and early 1990s, men’s cosmetic products that used to be limited to toothpaste, deodorant, and shaving cream widened to include a dizzying array of tools and liquids to administer to any case of ugliness anywhere on the body. And men ate up that advertising and reached deep into their pockets. Cut to the early 2000s, and Bravo’s “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” made the trend a bona fide American capitalist success story. Television shows are generally invented as wrapping for commercials. The advertising market for men’s products had grown so much that an entire show was needed for all the sales pitches.

How did a noble cause like feminism get caught up with our men primpers? Well, as most of you know, feminism didn’t liberate femininity in our culture. It liberated masculine energy in women. This is good. Women needed a little more parity on the economic playing field. We were now liberated to fly jets, run corporations, and even hire our own smarmy attorneys when we needed them. Heck, we are now free to be a smarmy attorney if we want to. Feminism gave us economic power, a voice in law and politics, and sometimes an intimidating presence in our love relationships.

But no cultural shift goes unpunished — that is, no shift in a world paradigm happens in a vacuum. Other opposing or dependent forces get shifted as well. So as masculine energy increased in women, a natural yin-yang happened with the male gender. Feminine energy began to be freed in men. While body consciousness and sexual preening had been primarily the bastion of women in all primates, human men now became “feminized.” Translation: those pretty boys with the waxed chests and the spray tans, whom we fondly call metros.

The biggest point about this article is not that metrosexual men exist, nor whether most women are even attracted to them. The biggest point is that so many people, men and women alike, believe they are making individual choices independent of cultural pressure. In fact, our culture is the most pervasive dictator because it is so invisible sometimes. Remember, it can be hard to see the forest because of all the trees. And sometimes it’s hard to see the wizards of Madison Avenue because we “need” those products so badly.

Preen away, you metrosexual guys. Cosmetic companies are happy to have your money. And as for feminine energy, while you’re busy buying “Dye for Guys,” would you pick up some diapers too, and learn how to change them?

Read more: http://www.momlogic.com/2009/10/the_rise_of_the_metrosexual.php#ixzz0TmYycYLd

Real Men Hate the Word Love

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

imagesHave you ever noticed that I talk about relationships all day long and I only rarely mention love? And when I do, it is usually to caution that it is a delusion intertwined with sexual attraction. Or, I remind you that love is a verb, not a noun. An action word. Not a state of being. Long term love is an intellectual commitment, I say.

Could I sound any more unromantic?

Hey, and speaking of romance, I normally dismiss flowers, chocolate, fine wine, and high heels as  simple accoutrements to delusion. I should also tell you that my “brainy” ideas about love have garnered me a group of male readers who say, “finally a woman who gets it.” Men do love to make rational sense of things that are so irrational. And men love to hate the word love. It feels weak to think feelings for a woman might disempower them.

But do I really get it?

I certainly have some textbook notions about how biology and psychology get all tangled up and sometimes make people do things they shouldn’t be doing. Running off with a paramour when a perfectly good spouse is right in front of you. Staying with an abusive spouse because of love. Jumping into bed with a Casanova because you will be the one to change him. Thinking that a loss of sexual energy is a loss of love. And, my favorite transgression of love’s delusion: Dragging children through our delusions.

Could love really be that dangerous? Must it always involve some form of heartbreak, dysfunction, boredom, loss, or even violence? And if that is the case, why do we march right back into the fire when we should know better?

I have some of the answers. But only some.

Psychologists would say that love is a seeking out of early womb experiences and infantile bliss. A baby’s play and cuddling becomes an adult sex life. Parts of our brain consider a lover a kind of mother, a nurturer, a protector, even an executor of boundaries. We feel safe and cared for in a love relationship.

We do it, that is, fall in love because it is the single best chemical high in our lifespan. At least, the best high that both genders can experience. We women, also get to do childbirth, which is pretty darn close to experiencing heaven and hell at the same time. But love is different. It is shared with an adult.

Both genders can experience love together. Love. An unconscious handshake between too souls who agree there is more to this world than work, play, and food.  It is an exchange of mutual projections that when executed well, is better than any Academy Award winning movie. Love may be a delusion but it is one of the best ones we have. And sometimes it’s all we have. With so many people losing faith in old religions, I wonder if love is becoming our new religion. And what is faith after all? Merely a belief in something that we have little scientific proof of. I would venture to say that we have far more proof of love’s power than many religions do in their folklore. The selfless acts of love that happen every day are real, observable, and can bring us to our knees in awe of the God-like powers within humans.

Now I will really go out on a limb and say that Love (look, I’m using a cap now!) can feel like a spiritual experience. All we can hope for, is that each new love relationship will bring us different challenges. We hope that as we grow we will not become trapped in familiar, unhealthy patterns that get us stuck. Delusion or not, love is something we should all sign up for. It’s an antidote to fear, horrific TV news, sickness, and other suffering. Love is the answer. And when life gets us down, when we feel, shame, loneliness, victimized, pressured, indecisive, or angry, love is the only choice that will work every single time. It won’t always have an instant result and it won’t always come back directly to us with the precision of a ping pong ball, but a loving act will change our biology and change the world. One selfless act at a time. Don’t fear love, nor waste it thoughtlessly. It is the biggest gift you will ever receive. Ya listening guys?

Update: I Crashed Into A Scary Biker Dude

Saturday, October 10th, 2009

If you’ve been following the story, here’s the update: Ramiro and Lauren spent a lovely weekend as my guests over Labor Day holiday. I met her best friend who is a news producer in Louisiana and Ramiro’s brother Marco. Lovely people. Unfortunately Lauren (who is diabetic) was rushed to the hospital the next day for emergency surgery. She is recovering well. I swear, it wasn’t my food! Here’s the back story:

wendy and biker

DR. WENDY WALSH: Thump. That was the only sound I heard. What followed was a horrific vision — the body of a man tumbling on the pavement in front of my car, his motor cycle not far behind him. I screamed and slammed on the brakes. As I jumped out of the car to run to him, I ordered my eleven-year-old to call 911.

It’s every driver’s worst nightmare. A motorcyclist in our blind spot. That day had been a busy Mom day of errands accomplished despite the bickering kids in the car. I was driving my new Prius. Having just made the big lifestyle change from a succession of  enormous SUV’s, my blood curdles at the thought of how that day would have gone had I hit that man with an SUV. But the Prius, and its blind spot were new to me, and as I moved into a left turn lane in a busy commercial area in Los Angeles, there it was. That sudden, terrifying thump.

When I reached the man, he had gotten to his hands and knees. He looked up at me and quietly said, “You didn’t see me?” Clearly I hadn’t and I felt like a fool, although I was thankful he was talking. Then my eyes began to take in more details of my victim as his hulking frame rose up from the pavement. The dude had to be 6’4″, about 250 pounds, with tattoos covering every inch of visible arms. His ears, lips, and nose were dotted with gleaming piercings. His helmet had spikes shooting out from the crown, and the piece de resistance, a sticker on his bike that read, “I’m a Devil’s Desciple. Don’t f— with me.”

I was nervous, so I started talking.  Going on about my six-year-old who had been screaming in the back seat. I paused to take a breath and  hoping for some empathy from this man who might easily make my kids orphans, I asked, “Are you a parent?”

“Yah,” he said, “I have four boys.”

That’s when I felt all the blood leave my legs. My knees started to buckle. Tears began their swell from behind my eyeballs. My thoughts raced, “I could have killed a father. I could have killed a father.”

The man I hit is named Ramiro Tovar. At that moment he must have seen my remorse and compassion for his next words surprised me. He gestured to me and said, “Don’t you start crying, or I’ll start crying.” That was it. Two total strangers realizing we have more in common than not — the love for our children.

The next minutes were a whirlwind of sirens bringing police, ambulance, and firefighters — all kind men who  assured Ramiro and I that we were both very lucky. I looked at the undoubtedly expensive tattoos on his arms, now glistening pink with road rash. I kept asking him how he felt. He said he felt okay. The interesting thing about this man, is that his attitude reminded me of an old school tough guy — the kind you might see in an old gangster movie, still going strong after taking a bullet. Ramiro shook it off, sucked it up, and refused to go to the hospital. In a country where so many quickly sign up to play victim, this was a real M-A-N. So manly, that when he called his brother on his cell phone, he ordered him not to tell his wife, for he didn’t want her to worry. This man had just had a terrifying accident and his big concern was to protect his wife. I was impressed.

After the police reports were made, Ramiro gave me a big bear hug and said, “Just fix my bike. That’s all I care about.” I squeezed his frame for a beat longer and whispered a most heartfelt apology. Little did I know that this man and I would be breaking bread three days later.

That evening, after I had made dinner for my, now somber, kids and was draining a large glass of red wine myself, my cell phone rang. It was Ramiro. His voice was low, almost a bit shy. He told me he was home and his wife had finished crying now. Then he gingerly asked me if she could cook dinner for me that coming Friday night. He said we could discuss between us how the repairs could be made on our vehicles and whether using my insurance was even necessary. I rushed to accept the invitation. I had a strange desire to see Ramiro again, to meet his lucky wife, and to connect as people. I think we both felt that our lives had crossed from some reason.

No sooner had I accepted the invitation, than pessimistic voices tried to derail my plan. Friends told me not to go. They warned me it could be dangerous. They told me to bring a guy with me. They told me not to bring my kids. I flirted with all these ideas, but in the end, I listened to my stomach and my girls and I donned some pretty sundresses and proceeded up the 405 freeway to an apartment in an unfamiliar neighborhood.

The meal was delicious. I brought him a gift – a DVD of the Academy Award winning movie called Crash. I met Lauren, his second wife, whom he met in Mississippi when he moved there after Hurricane Katrina to do some home rehabilitation work. She has been his bank teller and the site of a huge, Hispanic, biker was new in her part of the country. After some time convincing her family that Ramiro was a gentleman underneath the black leather, they married and moved back to Los Angeles. I learned about the Devil’s Desciples, a 40-year-old motor cycle club that has national get togethers with, you guessed it, beer, camp fires and fights over women. I shared with them some facts about my life, being a Canadian, raising multi-racial kids in Los Angeles, and how I’d never met a real bike gang member before. We each made jokes about the stereotypes we had heard about each other. I laughed at the enormous bottle of hot sauce on the table. I told him it was the biggest bottle of “Mexican Ketchup” I’d ever seen. He told me he thought I might not show up for dinner. He was surprised I was so “nice.”

It’s been ten days since the accident now. The Insurance adjustors are doing their thing in slow, bureaucratic fashion. I’ve been speaking with Ramiro every day. He and Lauren have Facebook Friended me and now my news feed includes status reports about the Devil’s Desciples. Adds a little color to all the other, more run-of-the-mill reports. I have invited them to spend a weekend at the beach with me. Really. I feel a deep connection to this man, this father, and this husband. And let me tell you ladies, when a guy who looks like Ramiro tells you that he’ll always have your back, it feels really good. Don’t mess with me world — I’ve got a guardian angel in black leather!

Love & Letterman

Friday, October 9th, 2009

47_david_lettermanlarge_image-1We’ve all heard the saying that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I don’t happen to agree with this pessimistic outlook. I have far more faith in humans to self regulate.

But it appears that David Letterman has a problem self regulating.

Anyone who owns a television knows that late night talk show host, David Letterman is currently embroiled in a, well, in a mess. First an extortion attempt against him, that spilled into public details of Dave’s complicated sex life, where it appears that for a few decades his primary hunting ground has been his workplace. Not good, Dave.

Is it illegal to have a workplace tryst? Absolutely not. People report that they fall in love at work all the time. Work is one of the best places to meet a potential spouse. Is it illegal to be having sex with two different people without their knowledge? Nope. Free country, after all. We are free to screw whomever we want (both definitions intended.) Is it illegal for bosses to screw subordinates? Now, here’s where it gets dicey Dave. If the boss creates an uncomfortable sexual environment or offers a quid pro quo for sex, then yes, the court calls this sexual harassment and it’s against the law. No one knows if boss-man Mr. Letterman, did any illegal thing and so far, no woman has complained. But just the fact that he is the boss and his sexual taste runs toward younger women whom he has some workplace power over, makes this not a rosy romantic picture.

It is indeed ironic that the external boundary that caused this flurry, was another man’s jealousy. It appears that one of Dave’s paramours was the girlfriend of an NBC news producer who is having hard economic times in this recession. And who isn’t? But this guy decided that David Letterman would be his prince with the glass shoe, or at least scared enough to write a check with plenty of zeros on it. He asked Dave for $2-million in exchange for keeping quiet about the now married Dave’s workplace sex life. That’s where the game stopped for these boys. Dave called in mommy to stop the mean bully. The rest is on your TV every night.

What’s happening here? Well, in simple caveman terms — an environment not far removed from NBC — Dave was the successful hunter who was bringing home the wooly mammoth to share with the tribe and that hunt gave him access to plenty of women who were hungry for their own kids food. Men have a strict pecking order and Dave, I mean the top dog hunter, could stay on top until he was really old and eventually a young buck would challenge him for all the women. Someone like A-Rod. You think it’s a coincidence that Letterman likes to make jokes about A-Rod? In the meantime, men in the pack still get some of Dave’s extra meat and extra women if they protect him. But that NBC news producer ran out of meat, was not such a great hunter himself, and even lost his babe to the big hunter. So he broke the male code, and challenged the top dog. And now the pack is still protecting Dave. The writers have rallied around him, writing jokes about other fallen sexual predators that amount to a, but-everybody-does-it defense.

And where are the women? Well, ex-girlfriend Merrill Markoe blogged that “Dave promised me many times that I was the only women he would ever cheat on.” A joke for sure, but the sub-text is this: Honey, if you’re going to eat the meat of a great hunter, you’d better be prepared to share. Ask any athlete’s wife about this rule.

What amazes me is that anyone is shocked. I mean, David Letterman is a famous guy. Most famous guys get lusty when they find power. (Pray that our president can suck on enough cigarettes to get through it without a scandle.) And, notice that none of Dave’s women have stepped forward with fingers pointed. Obviously he gave them enough meat that his short-term love was so worth it. I dunno. Somewhere in all this, my heart goes out to the sore loser who lost his money and his girl. Nice try for a last minutes save, buddy, but you lost. Take heart. It looks like you’ll get enough mystery-meat in jail.