Archive for the ‘Gender’ Category

On Men, Women, and Children….

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

I am in Costa Rica this week, on a quiet vacation with my children. I’m not supposed to be working. But thinking is my past-time so this blog erupted.

The blog started to bubble and hiss during a conversation with a young guide who helped us zip-line across the rain forest canopy. As he snapped hardware around the crotches of myself and a girlfriend, he grinned flirtatious directions like, “ladies, please spread your legs for me.” I thought this was a good time to ask if he was married. He shook his head and looked down. I took my cue and followed up with the other intrusive questions I have ready for evasive males. Children? Girlfriend? Fiance? Common law wife? In the end I discovered that this twenty-four year old has been living with a woman for the last five years and they have two children. But he has no plans to marry. This surprised me. In largely Catholic Costa Rica it appears that the no-rules-relationship-revolution is here too. I had thought this trend was exclusive to America where currently 40% of babies are born out of wed lock, my own included.

My thoughts came to a full boil a couple days later as I lay in a hammock under a palapa reading a biography referred by a friend. It is the story of the double life of author Alice B. Sheldon who found freedom in expression in the late 60’s and early 1970’s using a male pseudonym. A frustrated feminist, her work in the science fiction genre railed with themes of female oppression and female anger, all safely tucked inside the bodies of space aliens. This made me think about where I am today. Where we are, as women, as men, and children.

For years I have wrestled with questions destined for women of my generation. Unlike Alice, we were born liberated women, saddled with career goals (and identity!) Some of us are more like paycheck toting wives with economic parity on the home front but that’s still important. My mother, a sidelined feminist, never burdened me with a Cinderella dream of a prince and a castle, but instead noisily stuffed her unused ambition into my tiny head with words like “independence” and “…don’t need a man.” So many of my girlfriends were spoon fed the same messages by working mothers of the seventies or housewives who lingered at home and watched the battles from the foxholes of magazines, books, and television. I don’t consider myself a feminist in the vein of the early soldiers. Sometimes I call us post feminists. At other times I give a nod to those still actively organized in the cause of liberating women and acknowledge the third wave of feminism.

But my problem is this. Now that I am safely on the other side of the big leaps of struggle, past the shoulder pads and most of the glass ceilings, I see the flaws in the movement. I see the babies thrown out with the bath water. I hear the cries of toddlers with attachment injuries as motherhood increasingly becomes outsourced. I see the crumbling of good enough marriages and other kinds of love commitments as women continue to demand sanity and freedom. And I shake my head with astonishment at the one, last, accepted remnant of femininity, now exploded into a grotesque commercial monster — the sexualization of women. Must a new mother, plump with maternal fat stores designed to sustain a long term breast feeder, struggle on a stair master to squeeze into the latest Victoria’s Secret merchandize to please a husband and a culture and her female co-workers, who congratulate her for getting back into her jeans and her cubicle and her BMW within weeks of giving birth? I ask you, is this liberation?

What my mother forgot to tell me as she cheerfully handled Daddy’s paycheck and sent him off to supervise my brother’s hockey games and chauffeur me to ballet class, is that, in fact, to raise children well, you do need another person. That other person may not be a man. And he or she may in attendance out of economic necessity rather than biological obligation or love, but it really does take two people (at least!) to shoulder the workload and help us mothers feel liberated. And, by the way, raising kids and managing a home can be empowering itself. Mom didn’t know that because she didn’t have a cubicle or stock options to compare it to.

The third wave of feminism calls for more affordable childcare to help women on the path to some sort of economic equality. But shuttling babies and toddlers out to strangers is not the answer in my book. And what of the maternal women who work as childcare providers? Will the third wave of feminism find more liberated maternal women to help raise their kids? Then where does it all end? Probably with an underclass of low paid women skilled in childcare but little else. Oops! I think we have that already. We give these duties to immigrant women and call them liberated from their oppressive home cultures. Urgh! Feminism would do better to help “liberated” women relearn the some antiquated tools of relationship skills. Women have a specific skill set when it comes to communication and emotions. Why not put that to work into their relationships and get a helper with a biological interest in raising offspring?

And what of men? I mean, what are we going to do with all the fine men out there whose jobs as husbands and fathers are being outsourced?  I had dinner with a twice divorced man a while back who summed things up in a dismal way. “All women need us for is money,” he sighed. “As long as my child support checks keep coming, they need me for little else.”

But even that straight forward, though demoted task, may not be in the cards for men. If you believe last month’s Atlantic magazine article entitled “The End of Men,” women have both the numbers and skills to organize a coope. With 75% of embryos from fertility clinics being popped out as females (per parental request,) women outnumbering men on college campuses, and the decline of labor intensive jobs in favor of white collar employment that requires good social intelligence and communication skills, a matriarchal America is on the horizon. Already women make up more than half of the work force.

During the last year, my blogs has used data on gender and marriage to help us understand the changes in gender and relationships. I have tackled the rise of the metrosexual (liberated by masculine energy in women and by capitalist longings to sell more personal grooming products), the high divorce rate and birth outside of an old fashioned legal contract, the power and high depression rates of women today, the psychology behind cheaters, the growing single mother village and the confusing gender role expectations that sabotage so many relationships.

But the biggest question that still remains unanswered and it will be the burden of my daughters’ generation. What is the best basket to raise confident, loving children, who know how to attach long enough to raise confident, loving children? I’m still not sure what that answer is.

Our young zip line guide spends his days shuttling tourists like cattle across the treacherous heights of the rain forest canopy. He tells me his “girlfriend” says he works too much and doesn’t spend enough time with her and the kids. He tells me he loves his kids and he loves her, he just doesn’t like her anymore. So many marriages, legal or not, reach that stage of boredom and irritation. My best guess is that this is the time to use a human’s powerful mind to find a new path toward intimacy and commitment. Of course I speak from a place of wistfulness. Maybe the new kind of family will be our motley group who travelled to Costa Rica. Three single parents, five kids, and we mothered and fathered them all like an ancient village.

Breastfeeding is not Creepy. Think Like a Woman!

Monday, June 28th, 2010

Our highly sexualized culture has gone too far when women (read: nature’s nurturers) are claiming that breastfeeding is gross. When women begin talking like men in terms of sexuality and defile their own bodies then you know that this third-wave of feminism hasn’t done much to truly liberate femininity. Instead we have colluded with the boys club to masquerade as an equal. This is not equality. Sexualizing our breasts is fine. Breasts are beautiful. But enslaving breasts to all things sexual and sentencing them to a life without maternal power is sad, servitude to all things male.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. Here are the facts that have me ranting over my morning coffee today.

Recently Kathryn Blundell, the editor of a leading British parenting magazine, Mother and Baby, wrote an editorial entitled  I formula-fed. SO WHAT? . In it, she said breastfeeding is creepy and called breasts “fun bags” and continued with “seeing your teeny, tiny, innocent baby latching on where only a lover has been before feels, well, a little creepy.”

And, on this side of the pond, that wise, sage Kim Kardashian — whose own boobs are limited to working the night shift –  tweeted this to her fans: “ew, some woman has her boobies out, she should cover up, yuck, blech, ugh”

I understand that eyebrows get raised by this public display of this natural beauty, for I once staged a research study for my psychology dissertation on breastfeeding and romantic attachment. While interviewing nursing mothers I learned that one of the most common reasons that women quit breastfeeding is embarrassment about nursing in public. All over Europe, paintings and statues of the Madonna (the real one, not the one who Vogues) depict her nursing, yet our American culture still can’t get past the idea that breasts are more than sexual objects.

The sexualization of the breast had very early beginnings. Back in our evolutionary past, when humans got up off all fours and became bipedal, women evolved to grow larger breasts for sexual attraction. Now that we were upright, our lovely derrieres couldn’t be seen from our front side, so breasts got bigger as a kind of, ahem, yes, frontal tushy. Men liked the view on both sides now, and all our lovely orbs signaled our fitness to reproduce.

But for hundreds of thousands of years, breasts still had a day job, and the sight of a nursing woman was commonplace in all cultures around the world. For millions of years, up until 1932, every human being was breastfed by their mother, auntie, or wet nurse. It was how humans survived before infant formula. During World War II, when women were needed in factories to build weapons, mostly male pediatricians convinced women that this new product made from whey (a cheese by-product) was better than human milk. It also allowed women to leave their babies for longer periods. Anyone who has nursed a newborn knows that feeding schedules are based on a child’s needs, not a clock. And, sometimes their need is to just suckle and be comforted, so working full-time is possible, though tough.

Even though breastfeeding is on the rise today, it is in an uncomfortable race with racy messages. Sexy women are hot. MILF’s are hot. Women who nurse are creepy. Fortunately, our increasingly sexual media is co-mingled with a powerful chant of a growing body of women who still think like women. Women who know that breastfeeding contributes to healthy attachments and good health all around. Women like, Bettina Forbes, who co-founded “Best for Babes” a group that normalizes breastfeeding and shows that nursing moms can be powerful, sexy, glamorous, and nurturing all at the same time. Thousands of women follow her on facebook and are the what I like to call, the real feminists.

When women hate the natural function of own bodies, they need to stop and think. Whose sentiments are being recycled? I’ll tell you who. Those of a dying, patriarchal culture whose boys club would prefer that you enslave the boobs to them.

And here’s some news to throw back in the face of anyone who thinks that breasts are only “fun bags.” According to one of my all-time favorite studies, guess which kind of woman is most likely to choose to breastfeed? The woman who is most comfortable with sex, erotica, and her body. Prudes don’t breastfeed. Hear that Kathryn and Kim? Sexy women can feed their babies.

A “Viagra” for Women Marketed as if Womanhood is a Disorder

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

In a race to be the first to market with a female version of Viagra-style medication, a German pharmaceutical company, Boehringer Ingelheim, is pressuring the FDA to approve it’s new daily pill that promises to increase libido in women. The FDA is stalling, saying that the side affects of nausea and dizziness are worse than the problems it is trying to treat. And, that a women’s libido is complicated and no one knows how much emotions and psychology play into it. But, none-the-less, the company is trying to turn low sex drive in women into a widespread pathology.

Historically the medical community has loved to medicate womanhood. Depending on which study you read, one in six American women are currently on an SSRI (anti-depressant.) I guess that’s an advancement from traumatic surgical hysterectomies that women were once forced to endure to cure “hysteria.” And how about postpartum depression? It’s the darling diagnosis of our generation. Funny, affluent women with less pressure to work and mothers with extensive family support have lower rates of PPD. Now the drug companies are telling mothers, us exhausted caregivers/providers, that we have a sexual dysfunction???

According to the New York Times, there are questions about how pervasive low-sex-drive is in women. It is a bonafied diagnosis in the DSM-IV called hypoactive sexual desire disorder. And many of the studies mentioned in medical literature suggest that one in ten women suffer from the disorder. But the problem is this: Those studies have been financed by drug companies.

While the FDA weighs in, the German company is going ahead with a marketing campaign that includes a web site, a Twitter feed, a Discovery Channel documentary, and a publicity tour with Actress Lisa Rinna, a former Playboy model.

Here’s my two cents. To anyone who’s listening at the FDA or at home: We mothers do not need a pill to have a more active libido. Fly us to a resort. Give us room service. And stand back boys. Watch how fast our libidos come back!!!

Kobe Bryant: Can Warriors Kiss Babies?

Friday, June 4th, 2010

This morning I watched an interesting debate on ESPN News. The male anchors expounded psychological theories of gender roles, the warrior code, and men’s ability to compartmentalize. Of course, they thought they were just talking about Laker Kobe Bryant’s pause to kiss his daughters at half time during game one of the NBA finals last night.

Most of the ESPN talent chalked up Kobe’s “transgression” (an act of tenderness mid-war) to the privilege of celebrity. They argued that a franchise player without a camera on his heels would have been reprimanded by coach Phil Jackson and called “soft” by his team mates.

Then they went on to ask how Kobe’s head could be completely in the game if he took time to act like a loving father while wearing the armor of a warrior at battle. After all, minutes before hand, he’d been oblivious to Chris Rock’s monologue beside the Laker bench. And now he was kissing babies?!

Well, gentlemen, let me break it down for you. A male brain is unique. Men have a very unique ability to compartmentalize, that is, go so deeply into a mental compartment that they tune out other stimuli. Studies have shown that when men watch sports, their wife’s voice in the background sounds a lot like the adults in a Charles Schutz “Peanuts” cartoon, “Waw-aw. Waw-aw. Waw-awn.” One fascinating study asked men and women to listen to two audio stories simultaneously yet follow only one. One narration fed through a right earphone and the other a left. Women, who tend to be multitaskers, found their brains scrambling to follow both stories and often got confused. Men were more easily able to key into one story and tune out the other. Now that’s compartmentalization.

The other thing men can do is slip pretty easily from one compartment into another when they perceive that it is safe to redirect their attention. Thus, a man can juggle calls from work, his mistress, and his wife when there is little threat of being caught. Should his wife, mistress, or boss enter his office, however, he will be quick to focus and eliminate the two other stimuli.

So, while Kobe couldn’t hear Chris Rock during the game, his stress responses were lowered with the half-time bell and the Laker’s comfortable lead, making it was easy for him to morph into “Daddy” on his way to the locker room.

But the bigger question had to do with masculinity and tenderness. Can a warrior be tender? Of course he can. And he always has been tender behind closed doors. And now he can do it publicly. Thank you Kobe.

Love Style and Birth Order: Does the baby of the family always grow up to desire more sex? And, are divorced couples most likely to have the same birth order?

Friday, May 7th, 2010

An area that has fascinated psychologists for most of this century is sibling birth order in relation to just about everything: intelligence, sexuality, personality, mate selection, etc. A quick review of the research shows that there is also great debate in how much of a role birth order plays in who we are. It seems for every study that claims to have a significant result, another one disputes the data. My personal anecdotal experience indicates that birth order and gender tend to affect mate selection as people seem to choose a romantic partner that matches some early life coupling. For instance, as a middle sister, I tend to be attracted to eldest born men. My little brother seems to go for middle or eldest females too. But again, this is just my speculation.

In scanning some of the current research, here are a few interesting findings that might make you look harder about your objects of attraction and you ways of relating to them.

First of all, here’s a basic run-down of personality traits that tend to be associated with birth order. Do any of these characteristics resemble you?

Birth Characteristics

First Born

  • More responsible then other siblings (Alder)
  • Overemphasize the importance of law and order (Alder)
  • Serious (Leman, 2000)
  • Goal oriented (Leman, 2000)
  • Conscientious (Leman, 2000)
  • Well organized (Leman, 2000)
  • Conservative (Alder)
  • Emotionally intense (Koch, 1955)
  • Upset by defeat (Koch, 1955)
  • Higher esteem (Morales, 1994)
  • Leadership characteristics (Morales, 1994)

Middle Born/Second Child

  • Mediators (Leman. 2000)
  • Acquire fewer problems (Leman. 2000)
  • Set unrealistic goals (Alder)
  • Achievement oriented and often fails (Adler)
  • People pleaser
  • Calm
  • ‘Go with the flow’
  • More cooperative than first born (Adler)
  • Feel they are playing ‘catch-up’ to first born (Adler)

Youngest

  • Entertainers (Adler)
  • Pampered (Adler)
  • Dependent (Adler)
  • Selfish (Adler)
  • Attention seeking (White, 2007)
  • Lazy (Adler)
  • Spoiled (Adler)
  • More open to experiences (Big Five Personality Test)

Only Child

  • An only child has no rivals for the patents’ affection and may be pampered causing later interpersonal difficulties.
  • Only child take more internal responsibility for their actions because they never had other siblings to blame things on. (Falbo, 1981)
  • Only child had a lower need to be sociable

In terms of romantic attachment style, birth order does not seem to play as big a role in partner choice, but it can affect emotions that influence relationships. For instance, one study from the Netherlands found that later borns were more jealous than firstborns, and that only children were only slightly less jealous than firstborns. So, it is suggested that the experience of exclusive love and attention in one’s childhood, leads to a lower level of jealousy among firstborns. In another study published in 2008 in the North American Journal of Psychology found that middle children had the most jealousy. Were us middle’s so neglected that we feel jealous? Another interesting finding of that same study is that the baby of the family grows up to be the biggest romantic.

One of my favorite studies showed that partners with the same birth order (two youngest, two middles or two eldest) did not guarantee a successful relationships. They could be happy or unhappy. Birth order wasn’t a factor. But  this study found something else astounding: Birth order is a huge factor in unsuccessful relationships! A study of ex’s found that they are likely to be of the same birth order. Hummmm. Very interesting. The Ex who fathered my children is also a middle born.

As for sexual behavior, another study showed that later borns seem to desire more sex than first borns. Additionally, first born people desire to have children at a younger age, suggesting a greater pursuit of long-term sexual strategy than the baby of the family. The draw back to this fascinating study is that is was a self-report study and in my opinion, people lie about sex more than they lie about money.

And on the subject of romantic attachment, birth order doesn’t seem to be as influential as a mother’s attachment style. Mother’s don’t tend to change attachment styles between children and first-borns don’t show better attachment skills than second babies. I might add here, that this study didn’t look at later borns from very large families where a mother couldn’t possibly have the time to practice the a secure attachment style with a sixth, seventh, or eighth child.

Finally, back to the profile of me, the middle born. Yes, me, me, me, the ignored middle born. Middle borns express more positive views toward friends and less positive opinions of family in general. Could that be why I live thousands of miles away from my siblings, yet more than two-hundred friends recently wished me a happy birthday on line? Mating strategies are also a bit different for middle-borns. One Canadian study showed that middle borns are the least likely to cheat on a partner. Are you reading that, prospective boyfriend candidates? Of course, studies are just that. A study of a smallish group of people with an attempt to generalize the findings across a larger group. But this is one study, I’ll be happy to wave around. :)

Female Sexuality: Six Things That May Surprise Men

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

The study of women’s sexuality is relatively new in the grand scale of research history, but now science is finding statistics about women’s sexuality that make most women say, “Duh.” Here are a few recent studies that might surprise some men:

1. Women tend to become aroused by erotica involving men, men and women, and just women, indicating a bisexual arousal pattern. This doesn’t mean women all behave in a bisexual manner. It simply means they can be turned on by both thoughts or images of both genders. This is different from most straight men who only become aroused by heterosexual erotica, and gay men who mostly become aroused by homosexual material.

2. Women’s brains can separate mental arousal from genital arousal. For instance, even if she is not mentally stimulated, a woman’s body can have a physiological reaction to sex. (Thus the confusion of some rape victims who experience a spontaneous orgasm during the trauma.) And women can sometimes be mentally aroused and have trouble becoming wet and wild down below.

3. Body image is connected to sexuality for women. Women who feel more positively about their own genitals find it easier to orgasm and are more likely to engage in sexual health promoting behaviors, such as having regular gynecological exams or performing self-examinations.

4. For women, physicality grows out of emotionality. Emotional availability activates their physical sexuality. Women are more apt to show up physically and sexually when their partner is emotionally present, while men tend more to just show up.

5. Women fear emotional infidelity more than physical infidelity and men fear the opposite. In one study women preferred that their husband see a prostitute once per week rather than have platonic, though intimate, lunches with a co-worker. This points to the fact that women fear a diversion of resources that might come with an emotional connection.

6. Women have less ability to have a stand alone physical relationship because their body releases oxytocin during orgasm. Oxytocin, the female bonding hormone, is also released during breastfeeding. For that reason women sometimes become bonded through sex even when they don’t mean to.

The Twilight Syndrome? Why Women Read Violent Books.

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

twilight1In the middle of a divorce battle, Sheila Bellush, a mother of quadruplets, confided to her sister that if anything were to ever happen to her, she should look up true crime author Ann Rule to tell her story. Sure enough, soon after, Sheila was shot and killed by a man hired by her husband. Rule’s book about the crime, Every Breath You Take, has sold over a million copies and 86% of its reviews on Amazon.com are written by women readers.

This anecdote is used in a new study that reveals why books that evoke fear are popular with women. People might assume that men, being the more aggressive sex, would be most likely to find such gory topics interesting. But the reverse is true. The researchers found that what makes books about graphic crime appealing to women is a survival instinct — a desire to to learn about crime in order to prevent becoming a victim. The study, “Captured by True Crime: Why Women are Drawn to Tales of Rape, Murder, and Serial Killers” is published in Social, Psychological and Personality Science, and makes a connection with women’s fascination with crime and their internal fear. Despite the fact that women are statistically less likely than men to become a victim of a violent crime (with the exception of rape) they perceive themselves to be in more danger. Some researchers blame the media, that tends to award more coverage to violent crimes against women than those with male victims.

The problem with the practice of reading about crime, according to the researchers, is that it can become a vicious cycle. Women feel fear and read about crime in order to be better informed about ways to prevent or survive a crime, but they also become unknowingly exposed to more dangers! They meet more murderers, more unusual ways to bite the bullet, and their fear-actor goes up. Thus, the books become a fear-based cycle for women who are buying them to decrease their fears.

All this got me thinking about the obsession my daughter and her friends have with the Twilight series of books and movies. With Vampires around every corner, there is no shortage of danger and blood flow in those pages. And clearly there is much confusion for heroin Bella as to which man-boy-vampire can be trusted. I wonder if the principles that the researchers discovered about true crime novels also apply to this kind of romantic thriller.

In today’s times, love has become a dangerous game for teen girls. While most of the sexual mores — like the double standard — have been removed, women are still more at risk for pregnancy, an STD, or a broken heart. (Women’s oxytocin release during orgasm helps create a bond.) Could the Twilight vampires, a metaphor for dangerous love, be one way that young girls are trying to make sense of all this?

And if the researchers speculations are true, might this also become a vicious cycle? More stories about dangerous love means more exposure to ways that women can be hurt by men. Besides the Twilight series, there are enough literary clones to warrant a large display table at my local Barnes & Noble called “Dark Love.” Is this what are daughters fear today? Dark love?

Raising Confident Girls – Educate Her!

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Raising a self-confident daughter in a post-feminism age where choices are great, gender roles are fluid, and sexual messages are damaging is a confusing task for a mother. In this second of five articles on the subject, the key word is EDUCATION.

NWCfrontpagepicturesEducate your daughter. Period. Studies show the one thing that reduces teenage pregnancy and reduces overall birth rates in developing countries is the education of girls. It works here too. When girls receive a quality education and are valued at home for their academic achievements, miracles of self-esteem occur. Options become wider. Thinking processes become more complex, and peer pressure becomes only one factor in decision-making. And, providing a quality education need not cost you an arm and a leg. There are plenty of excellent public schools that lead to first-rate universities. But it’s up to you to do the research and make that education accessible to your daughter, even if it means moving to a better neighborhood.

But her intellectual mind is only half the equation. Anyone who has read Daniel Goleman’s groundbreaking books on emotional intelligence knows that even those who are not formally educated can succeed on social smarts alone. Knowing how to understand and communicate feelings is crucial in the business world — and leads to great powers of empathy, a hot skill in the free market.

To raise a self-confident daughter, you must teach her emotional intelligence. It’s the most important lesson a mother can give a child of any gender, and it includes a vocabulary that puts feelings into words. If we can’t name our feelings and share them, we are a long way off from being able to process them and use them in a healthful way. And we teach emotional health by modeling it. Having trouble labeling that feeling in your stomach, yourself? Here’s my handy dictionary of the most common feelings people express. Next time you tell a story to your daughter, add your emotional experience by saying “I feel,” followed by one of these words: Nervous, Happy, Sad, Angry, Disappointed, Hopeful, Ignored, Embarrassed, Envious, Jealous, Lonely, Excited, Surprised, Proud, Scared, Guilty, Aroused, Uncomfortable, Rejected, Loved. Using these “feeling words” in everyday life opens your daughter up to the parallel universe of people’s emotional lives.

Tomorrow: How exposure to relationships shapes her capacity to love.

Raising A Confident Daughter – Respect Her!

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

IMG_2017In this day and age, girls may have more freedom to pursue their dreams but they also have more confusion. The working world they will enter is still not a place where feminine energy is rewarded and the messages that women are being sent about sexual freedom may be setting them back. Because men and women are not equal, they are different, not one gender more powerful than the other. They may have many similar skills but their reward system is very different. Women value relationships and men value competition and power. So how do we help our girls “find themselves” as women in a world with so many choices and so few roadmaps? This is the first of five blogs can give Moms a few clues, and the word of the day is RESPECT.

Respect her Body from the Get Go. Our daughters won’t be able to respect their own bodies if we are intrusive. And this respect starts with the diaper change. When you change you infants diaper, give verbal explanations for what you are doing even if you think they can’t understand. (Babies understand most of their mother-tongue long before they ever have the muscular ability to form words.) Imagine you are a helpless being, captive in the land of giants. How would you like to be touched, cleaned, and bathed?  As she grows older, give her privacy and teach her about good/touch, bad/touch and physical boundaries.

And, model self-respect yourself. We’ve all heard the adage that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. And Mama, you are the tree from which she will spring. Your actions will have a much greater impact on your daughter than your words. Trust me, soon she won’t even hear you because of that darned ipod! So, it is very important that we respect ourselves. That may mean speaking up in defense of yourself or your family, protecting yourself from damaging relationships or simply living the values that you hope your daughter will live.

How you live is the most important way you parent. Teaching your daughter be not give herself pain by being respectful of yourself can go a long way to boosting her self esteem. Tomorrow: Teaching emotional intelligence along with an academic education.

How to Raise a Self Confident Girl

Monday, January 11th, 2010

IMG_2179Dr. Wendy Walsh: I remember the moment I held my first-born daughter in my arms. I breathed a deep sigh of relief that I was given a baby who runs on estrogen. Yippee! I silently cheered. I got a girl. Girls I understand. This is something I know how to shape … and then they grew.

Nearly 12 years later, with two of them now under my roof — one sporting boobs, the other sporting moods — I more often ask, “Why me?” Why, God, couldn’t you have given me the far less complicated model of kid, a boy? Nonetheless, I have persevered, and I learned through experience and a whole lot of thick textbooks that raising a confident girl in a culture that still values logic over emotional intuition, and money-making skills over mothering skills, is quite an art.

We are a gender that excels in words rather than action. We are a gender whose feelings are sometimes more important than our grades, and our friendships define us more than anything. Girls build elaborate communities, and in our hunter/gatherer history, were the backbone of the species. Men hunted and dropped in with protein, but women still gathered more calories and maintained a multiaged moving “settlement” where babies, toddlers, teens, aunties, mothers, and grandmothers all had vital roles in the nest. Women’s power as a gender includes intellectual, emotional, nurturing, creative, and sexual power. Yah baby, hear us roar.

Fast-forward past hunter/gatherers, the farming age, and the industrial revolution to our current world — the Information Age, where we are now called post-feminists. Funny thing about feminism — it did an important job of liberating masculine energy in women and allowed our girls to gain some much-needed equity on the economic playing field, but we are now seeing that we threw the baby out with the bath water. Today, women with strong creativity, mothering skills, and emotional powers are not rewarded like the gals who excel in “left brain” math and logic. Seems the only traditionally feminine power that was allowed to remain and be rewarded is sexual power, and ladies, that’s getting out of control. Pardon my French, but it is raining whores! It’s some age in which to be raising a girl.

A recent poll done by Time magazine on the current state of American women is as positive as it is perplexing. In business, power, and economics, the news is good. Women make up 49 percent of the workforce and 57 percent of all college students, and hold jobs that include Supreme Court Justices, governors, and Ivy League presidents. However, even on the economic playing field, there is still a lag. For every dollar that men make, women earn only 77 cents. On the home front, things aren’t quite as rosy. Nearly 70 percent of women still have the primary responsibility of taking care of children, the sick, elderly, and theirhomes.

The problem that feminists didn’t forecast when they staged the International Women’s Year back in 1975 was this: as women left the household, no one else showed up to do the job she left at home — the down and sometimes dirty work of womanhood: cooking, cleaning, and child-rearing. Or, as I like to call it, playing with fire, chemicals, and poop! So what if our daughter would like to be a traditional woman and not want a career outside of the home (God forbid!)? Unless she is Martha Stewart and can turn her canning, crafts, and cooking into an empire, few men these days can finance this type of woman’s “hobby.” But what we can do is instill enough self-confidence in her that she feels empowered to create further progress for women.

So, as mothers, how do we raise self-confident daughters in a world that clashes with her biology and exerts pressure to earn money while toiling as queen of her castle? I wish I had all the answers. So I did some research. Read my next five blogs to learn how things like your respect, your words, your male friends, and your boundaries can make her a force to reckon with.