Archive for the ‘Sexuality’ Category

Breastfeeding is not Creepy. Think Like a Woman!

Monday, June 28th, 2010

Our highly sexualized culture has gone too far when women (read: nature’s nurturers) are claiming that breastfeeding is gross. When women begin talking like men in terms of sexuality and defile their own bodies then you know that this third-wave of feminism hasn’t done much to truly liberate femininity. Instead we have colluded with the boys club to masquerade as an equal. This is not equality. Sexualizing our breasts is fine. Breasts are beautiful. But enslaving breasts to all things sexual and sentencing them to a life without maternal power is sad, servitude to all things male.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. Here are the facts that have me ranting over my morning coffee today.

Recently Kathryn Blundell, the editor of a leading British parenting magazine, Mother and Baby, wrote an editorial entitled  I formula-fed. SO WHAT? . In it, she said breastfeeding is creepy and called breasts “fun bags” and continued with “seeing your teeny, tiny, innocent baby latching on where only a lover has been before feels, well, a little creepy.”

And, on this side of the pond, that wise, sage Kim Kardashian — whose own boobs are limited to working the night shift –  tweeted this to her fans: “ew, some woman has her boobies out, she should cover up, yuck, blech, ugh”

I understand that eyebrows get raised by this public display of this natural beauty, for I once staged a research study for my psychology dissertation on breastfeeding and romantic attachment. While interviewing nursing mothers I learned that one of the most common reasons that women quit breastfeeding is embarrassment about nursing in public. All over Europe, paintings and statues of the Madonna (the real one, not the one who Vogues) depict her nursing, yet our American culture still can’t get past the idea that breasts are more than sexual objects.

The sexualization of the breast had very early beginnings. Back in our evolutionary past, when humans got up off all fours and became bipedal, women evolved to grow larger breasts for sexual attraction. Now that we were upright, our lovely derrieres couldn’t be seen from our front side, so breasts got bigger as a kind of, ahem, yes, frontal tushy. Men liked the view on both sides now, and all our lovely orbs signaled our fitness to reproduce.

But for hundreds of thousands of years, breasts still had a day job, and the sight of a nursing woman was commonplace in all cultures around the world. For millions of years, up until 1932, every human being was breastfed by their mother, auntie, or wet nurse. It was how humans survived before infant formula. During World War II, when women were needed in factories to build weapons, mostly male pediatricians convinced women that this new product made from whey (a cheese by-product) was better than human milk. It also allowed women to leave their babies for longer periods. Anyone who has nursed a newborn knows that feeding schedules are based on a child’s needs, not a clock. And, sometimes their need is to just suckle and be comforted, so working full-time is possible, though tough.

Even though breastfeeding is on the rise today, it is in an uncomfortable race with racy messages. Sexy women are hot. MILF’s are hot. Women who nurse are creepy. Fortunately, our increasingly sexual media is co-mingled with a powerful chant of a growing body of women who still think like women. Women who know that breastfeeding contributes to healthy attachments and good health all around. Women like, Bettina Forbes, who co-founded “Best for Babes” a group that normalizes breastfeeding and shows that nursing moms can be powerful, sexy, glamorous, and nurturing all at the same time. Thousands of women follow her on facebook and are the what I like to call, the real feminists.

When women hate the natural function of own bodies, they need to stop and think. Whose sentiments are being recycled? I’ll tell you who. Those of a dying, patriarchal culture whose boys club would prefer that you enslave the boobs to them.

And here’s some news to throw back in the face of anyone who thinks that breasts are only “fun bags.” According to one of my all-time favorite studies, guess which kind of woman is most likely to choose to breastfeed? The woman who is most comfortable with sex, erotica, and her body. Prudes don’t breastfeed. Hear that Kathryn and Kim? Sexy women can feed their babies.

Al Gore a Sexual Predator? I don’t think so.

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

Just weeks after former vice president Al Gore grabbed headlines when he and wife Tipper announced their divorce after 40 years of marriage, newspapers are latching on to a four-year-old story that Gore was accused of sexually harassing a massage therapist in Oregon.

The only recent update is that authorities have dismissed her claim of “unwanted sexual contact” and her attorney said the case would be handled “civilly.” Read: For money not jail time. The sources are mostly tabloid. The National Enquirer broke the story four years ago and this week the New York Daily News tells it this way: In 2006, while staying at an upscale hotel on Portland, Oregon, Mr. Gore scheduled a massage under the name “Mr. Stone.” Then while the massage therapist was doing the abdominal portion of the massage, he made some moaning sounds and asked her to go lower, even attempting to guide her hand down below.

There are few things to consider when thinking about this story. Included in my thought process are this: the physiological possibilities of a man in deep relaxation, the wide-range of services and specialties available in the massage industry, and the biggest issue of all, personal boundaries verses perception of personal injury. So, for the purposes of this hypothetical examination, let’s assume this woman’s allegations are true. We don’t even know it that is so. And, let’s start with what happens to a man in deep relaxation. Anyone with a husband knows that spontaneous erections happen all the time during sleep. Hard-ons happen. Especially during a massage. Which is one of the reasons that female massage therapists dominate the industry. Heterosexual male clients feel too uncomfortable having a spontaneous erection at the hands of a man. So, let’s assume a hard-on happened during the massage. And any woman with a boyfriend knows that when some men get a hard-on, it appears that all the blood from their brain drains out to puff up their appendage. Thus many men have the capacity to make poor decisions when they are aroused. Now, let’s assume, solely for the purposes of scientific examination, that this was in fact the inconvenient truth for our dear former VP.

But besides biology, let’s place a little blame on the massage industry. In America, the quality and nature of massage services can run the gamut from licensed physical therapists who work with doctors, spa therapists who focus on sports massage and relaxation, to massage studios that offer a “full body release” (yes, that’s code for a complimentary hand-job,) to illegal massage parlors that offer sex for sale. Who knows which kinds of massage services big Al has had in the past. Might he mistakenly assumed that he was getting a full body service in Portland? Opps. Wrong kind of massage therapist, Mr. Gore.

Finally, there is the issue of boundaries. Everyone has a comfort level with levels of sexuality, both in what acts they can tolerate and how comfortable they are in making sexual requests. Maybe Al Gore, if the story is even true, has a good ability to communicate his sexual needs. Kudos to Al. On the flip side, maybe the massage therapist is particularly sensitive to sexual injury. One massage therapist might have brushed off his advance with a tsk! tsk! and a little admonishing to the cheeky boy while another might perceive the same interchange as a sexual assault. Injury is in the eye of the recipient. Let’s hope the whole thing was a big misunderstanding. Miss Prissy massage therapist can hopefully get some cash to mend her wound and Big Al can learn to stay awake during a massage. Boys will be boys.

P.S. Only because blog readers will claim that I forgot to mention this. Al Gore was married at the time. Is it okay for a married man to have a sterile, hand job in a professional setting? That’s fodder for another blog.

A “Viagra” for Women Marketed as if Womanhood is a Disorder

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

In a race to be the first to market with a female version of Viagra-style medication, a German pharmaceutical company, Boehringer Ingelheim, is pressuring the FDA to approve it’s new daily pill that promises to increase libido in women. The FDA is stalling, saying that the side affects of nausea and dizziness are worse than the problems it is trying to treat. And, that a women’s libido is complicated and no one knows how much emotions and psychology play into it. But, none-the-less, the company is trying to turn low sex drive in women into a widespread pathology.

Historically the medical community has loved to medicate womanhood. Depending on which study you read, one in six American women are currently on an SSRI (anti-depressant.) I guess that’s an advancement from traumatic surgical hysterectomies that women were once forced to endure to cure “hysteria.” And how about postpartum depression? It’s the darling diagnosis of our generation. Funny, affluent women with less pressure to work and mothers with extensive family support have lower rates of PPD. Now the drug companies are telling mothers, us exhausted caregivers/providers, that we have a sexual dysfunction???

According to the New York Times, there are questions about how pervasive low-sex-drive is in women. It is a bonafied diagnosis in the DSM-IV called hypoactive sexual desire disorder. And many of the studies mentioned in medical literature suggest that one in ten women suffer from the disorder. But the problem is this: Those studies have been financed by drug companies.

While the FDA weighs in, the German company is going ahead with a marketing campaign that includes a web site, a Twitter feed, a Discovery Channel documentary, and a publicity tour with Actress Lisa Rinna, a former Playboy model.

Here’s my two cents. To anyone who’s listening at the FDA or at home: We mothers do not need a pill to have a more active libido. Fly us to a resort. Give us room service. And stand back boys. Watch how fast our libidos come back!!!

Three Women. Three Glasses of Wine. Three Stories of Betrayal.

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

Being a Doctor of Psychology I can make academic sense of how successfully and without conscience many people lie. The best of them can go into a little mental compartment where they even believe their own lies as they flow out of their mouth.

I have seen Joran van der Sloot the suspect in the Natalee Holloway murder tell three separate stories about what happened in Aruba five years ago. In my opinion the only word of sordid truth he ever uttered was in Dutch when he referred to sweet Natalee as a “bitch.” The truth is that this young man has extreme anger toward women.

Lying to authorities to save your hide is one kind of deceit but what about the average person who lies to their closest intimates? Just last night, while sipping at a neighborhood wine bar, I heard three stories about men who lie to obtain sex, ego stroking, or even a woman’s trust. And as a woman (not a doctor, now) I have to say, what’s up with that?

In one story, my best friend’s longtime, on-again-off-again boyfriend was found to have fathered three children during the same years they whispered secrets between the sheets. Except he forgot to tell her that one secret — that his sperm, his time and his resources were going another direction.

In another story, a neighbor of mine was reeling from heartbreak after a broken engagement to an NFL football player (Read: He can afford bobbles.) In her loss and misery she thought she might console herself with a little recession era recycling so she marched her three carrot diamond ring to a jeweler, only to discover that a man she had once deeply trusted had given her a three carrot cubic zirconia.

While we continued to muse in disgust about how some men can feign intimacy and trustworthiness so well, the name of one of my old paramours came up. He’s been used as an example of a bad-boy in both my books (The Boyfriend Test and The Girlfriend Test) because this guy is the ultimate player. Over the course of our seventeen year “friendship” he has uttered the “L” word to me but he has also used my heart, my body and my money for his personal gain. He’s good, trust me. I have been out of his mesmerizing clutches for a few years now. Whew! But just a few weeks back I say him hiking with yet another beauty and shook my head to see that he’s still lying and juggling even at the age of, my God, could he be 53 by now? Anyway, my wine partners informed me that he had recently married his assistant. I laughed out loud, saying there is no way his marriage would have slowed down his appetite for frequent new sexual conquests. They assured me he is behaving as a loyal married man.

So I texted him a little “hello.”

And he quickly texted back. What he wrote were words that no married man should ever write to an old flame. My heart broke for his wife.

In the book, “101 Lies Men Tell Women, and Why Women Believe Them,” Dr. Dory Hollander claims that the root of all romantic lying is that women seek emotional connection and men mostly seek sex. The number one lie she sites? “I Love You.”

The saddest thing about my three stories of betrayal and the hundreds of stories in Dr. Hollander’s books is that so often we blame women for believing the lies. I was shocked to see the firestorm of criticism of Rielle Hunter, the mother of former presidential candidate John Edwards‘ fifth child. Somehow the media saw fit to place the bulk of the blame on her as a home wrecker. As the target of many, many lies issued from a male mouth, I can promise you that Mr. Edwards lied through his teeth to poor Miss. Hunter. First of all this slick rick wasn’t even playing in his own intellectual sandbox so getting her to believe his fabrications was probably a cake walk. I can just imagine his best promise to her, “Honey, you’re the one I love. My marriage is a sham to get me through this presidential campaign. Once I am president we can raise our baby in the White House.”  Trust me. His story ran along those lines.

The blame should never be on the recipient of a lie. Gullible people are innocent. Yes, I’ve removed the gender now, because some women lie as well as most men. But the culprit is the liar and his/her the lack of moral reasoning and inability to have compassion for others. The blame lies only with the deceitful person, not the one who trusted. What do you think?


Politician Preaches Abstinence — Except for Himself!

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

The video is priceless. Picture this: a staged interview with Indiana Republican Representative Mark Souder, about the importance of teaching sexual abstinence. Tracy Jackson, the young female aid doing the interview smiles coyly as her hand nervously slides up and down her pen. The tape was created for a Christian radio station. But the inside story is this: That Republican rep, a married father and grandfather and self-proclaimed evangelical Christian resigned today after it was discovered that he was NOT abstaining from having sex — with his aid, Miss Tracy Jackson!

Yep. Another cheating politician. And this time, one who campaigns for sexual restraint. Why can’t some politicians keep in their pants? And what does it say about us as a country when so many of our leaders are LYING CHEATERS?

The answers are simple. We have become a country that has undergone a no-rules relationship revolution in our media. Granted, marriage vows still have deep meaning for some and when the going gets rough (read: sexually boring) many married couples remember their intellectual commitments. Long after the sexual hormones have done their work of creating a bond and a nuclear family, many smart folks simply choose to focus sexual energy on the task at hand, that is, raising healthy children in a crazy world. One recent article in Psychology Today said that 80% of married couples are happy with their sex lives but they are probably happy with less. And that’s normal.

So, what about the other 20%? Have they bought the media falsehoods that sex is free from consequences and that more sex means more happiness? By the way, I’ve never seen any study that connects promiscuity with general feelings of happiness. And they also seem to have no guilt when it comes to lying. The only defense I can make for those who sexually betray their partner is that they fell victim to a tried-and-true rule of sexual behavior — sex with an obstacle is always more exciting than completely safe and permissive sex. The more risk, the more arousal.

One other nifty thing about the huge explosion of sexual content in the media (this blog included) is that it is really difficult for married celebrities or public servants to keep their affairs under wraps, because sexy stories bring eyeballs to news programs. So, on one hand, the media glorifies sex without boundaries and on the other hand it acts as a watch dog.

Sorry, Representative Souder. Your video came back to bite you. In a news conference in Fort Wayne, the beleaguered rep said, “I am so ashamed to have hurt the ones I love. I am sorry to have let so many friends down, people who have worked so hard for me.” His resignation is effective Friday.

The World’s Most Powerful Aphrodisiac? It’s not what you think.

Friday, May 14th, 2010

5692_124593686833_115788661833_3029554_5722933_nYou’ve heard about oysters and caviar. How about champagne and a warm bath? Trust me none of these have been proven as a true aphrodisiac. In case you need a definition, an aphrodisiac is a substance that supposedly increases sexual desire. The name comes from Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of sensuality and love. Throughout history, many foods and drinks have had a reputation for making sex more attainable and/or pleasurable. However, from a historical and scientific standpoint, the alleged results are mainly due to a belief by their users that they would be effective. Yep, a placebo effect.

But there is one thing that works most of the time. I attest that the world’s most powerful aphrodisiac is one simple word. It is the word “No.” Spoken loudly or quietly, spoken in behavior or lack of behavior, the word “no” makes a sexual suitor sit up and take notice. The principal behind such wisdom is this. A psychologist’s mathematical formula for great sex is simply

Arousal + Obstacle = Erotic Sex

Some historians believe that the Catholic Church populated the planet with that equasion. The Church told people to say NO to sex for pleasure purposes and then out-lawed birth control. The result: Catholics in every corner of the globe.

Now think back to your most exciting sexual encounter. Was it intergenerational? Interracial? Was one person unavailable in some way? Nothing like an obstacle, be it a cultural or personal taboo, to get our juices flowing. Or, was it someone of a higher social status who was unattaianable in some way?

My advice: If you want to have wonderful sex, say NO to easily attainable sex.

The Sex Lives of Your Children Are Written on the Wall

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace can be a treasure trove of information for parents. Reading your kids’ status updates is a great way to check in on peer group dynamics, level of media exposure, and school politics. Now research shows that your child’s cyber “wall” can even be an eye-opening place to discover if your adolescent is going to be sexually active anytime soon.

A recent study published by the America Academy of Pediatrics, suggests that displays of sexual references on teens’ Facebook profiles is associated with their intention to initiate intercourse. The study followed 85 college freshmen with public Facebook pages and found a strong association between sexual references on Facebook and real-world intentions to initiate sexual intercourse. Although the study looked at college freshmen, a separate 2007 study conducted by the Center for Disease Control showed that by ninth grade, 33% of adolescent had sexual intercourse, so it’s not far fetched to assume that sexual material posted by younger teens could also reflect real-world intentions.

Prior to this Facebook study, the same researchers, Dr. Megan Moreno of from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis of Seattle Children’s Research Institute, found that 54 percent of MySpace profiles contained high-risk behavior information, with 24 percent referencing sexual behavior. Of course, these on-line postings might indicate real-world risky behaviors or simply adolescent grandstanding, but what parent wants to wait to find out?

By tenth grade, the percentage of sexually active teens is just shy of 50% and this number does not include middle schoolers who engage in oral sex, which apparently is not considered sex despite the fact that one can acquire a sexually transmitted disease from it. Oi! And, parents, if you haven’t caught your breath yet, here’s a sobering statistic from the Center for Disease Control: One-third of American teenaged girls get pregnant before the age of twenty. That’s one in three, ladies and gentlemen.

So when is the right time to talk to kids about sex? That answer is simple: As soon as they start asking. When I was pregnant with my second daughter, my four-year-old asked me how the baby got in my tummy. I briefly flirted with the idea of giving her the pat answer my mother had provided me as a child, that “God put the baby there,” and then decided to tell her the truth. The director of our preschool gave me a delightful children’s book that helped me tell the whole story — yes with artistic sketches that showed “the act.” From that point forward I became the source of sexual information for my kid. Now that she’s in the complicated world of middle school, I am thrilled that she keeps asking and I get to provide biological information laced with my own moral teaching.

So, is it ever too late to start taking about sex with your child? NEVER. Teens may roll their eyes or plug into their iPod but, trust me, they listen to any source of sexual information, even when it comes from a parent.

Social networking sites can be a helpful way to be a virtual parent. Make a family rule that parents must be “friended” on kids pages. Before you know it, you will become lost in your child’s sea of online friends and sooner or later they’ll forget that you are reading their wall. Take postings seriously and use them not as an opportunity to admonish but as an chance to educate.

Bottom line: Know your own sexual morals and messages and find a way to guide your children before our highly sexualized media does it for you.

When Sex Doesn’t “Click.” A Sign to End A Budding Relationship?

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

A guy friend of mine who happens to be single mentioned that he’s had sex with a few women in the past few months and “nothing clicked.” When I reminded him that sex should never be the START of a relationship (the mixture of physical intimacy, budding emotional intimacy and fear can be completely toxic) he argued that if the sex isn’t “good” than it’s a sign the relationship will never work.

I beg to differ.

What is sex, after all, but an exchange of physical care, mixed with a longing for love, or an expression of love itself? Sex without an emotional connection is certainly possible and some people have stand alone sex in order to avoid intimacy. But for anyone looking for a real-world, mutually supportive relationship, early sex is always a sloppy mix of hope, hunger, and fear. Could this be “the one”? Will she/he like me enough? Can I perform? etc.

Waiting to have sex while building a little emotional intimacy can be protective in a number of ways. Delaying sex can establish good communication, trust, and a friendship that can weather the awkwardness of the “first-time.” Waiting to have sex can also screen out those who aren’t looking to create an emotional relationship — that includes bad-boys and girls who disassociate. I’m always amazed when I hear men tell me a dating story where they are out on a date and really beginning to open up to a woman about some emotional issue and the woman dismisses them and instead responds with, “Honey, I just want to f— your brains out.” Those stories confirm for me that sexual equality has arrived, coupled with its downside.

Finally, it’s important to consider that sexual attraction also has great psychological underpinnings. For instance, if we believe deep down that we are unlovable we may be specifically aroused by those who can’t offer emotional love. It’s our brain’s funny way of sticking to what’s familiar. Abuse and inconsistent love experienced as a child can create an attachment style geared toward abusive and inconsistent love relationships. We know we once survived unhappiness? Why risk the uncharted waters of a happy, consistent, supportive relationship?

Sometimes one’s arousal orientation — our attraction to a certain personality style or way of relating — is exactly the thing that brings us pain. The objects of our desire, while bringing us a “hot” physical experience are specifically attractive exactly because they fulfill out worst nightmares. For many people an intense sexual attraction should be a cue that this potential partner is bad for them. Intense lust is often a red flag for those who have an anxious or ambivalent attachment disorder.

Anyone who has experienced healthy, long-term monogamy knows that once the relationship becomes a multi-leveled partnership the sexual aspect of the relationship becomes far less important than the other ways a relationship feeds us — with trust, encouragement, consistency, and care. Relationships are an exchange of mutual care. Sexual attraction is part of phase-one construction that helps us secure a bond. But if we do not trust love, or deep-down feel unlovable, then our libido will be wired for pain. In that case, it is our journey to learn to use mind over heart. To think through our attractions and make different, often scary, choices instead of being led down a path of hormones toward a familiar pain. The key to happiness is our ability intellectually process our emotional life and make behavioral changes that may feel uncomfortable at first, but represent progress.

So can “bad” sex turn into “good” sex? Of course it can. Sexual incompatibility may be a case of nerves, inexperience, or a leap into those uncharted emotional waters. The solution is talk, trust, and gentle exploration. And, if you can’t talk about sex with someone then you shouldn’t be having sex with them.


An Epidemic of Cheaters???

Friday, April 9th, 2010

First David Letterman, Tiger Woods and John Edwards. Then Jesse James. And now ex-Giant, Tiki Barber is reportedly having an affair with his kid’s babysitter while his wife is pregnant with twins! What’s going on??? The big question on many women’s minds is this. Are more men cheating, or are more men getting caught? I think both things are true.

Cheating husbands are not be a new trend. After all, we are a primate society with what anthropologists like to call “perceived monogamy.” Today 65% of marriages break up because of an extra-marital affair. Despite the sexual revolution and the reduction of the “double standard,” more men still cheat than women. Now science shows us why this gender imbalance has existed for thousands of years.

First, there could be a genetic link. Swedish researchers recently identified an “infidelity gene,” which is present in four of 10 men. This gene can explain why some men are more prone to stormy relationships and bond less to their wives or girlfriends. However, it’s important to remember that biology is not destiny. People born with genetic predispositions to say, heart disease or obesity, make lifestyle adjustments that compensate for the negative gene.

Secondly, men may find it easier to cheat because they feel less guilt than woman. A Spanish study recently revealed that the interpersonal sensitivity (empathy) of men is low compared to women. This clearly could affect a man’s ability to empathize with his partner’s feelings of betrayal. The study also showed that men feel less intense guilt and this difference is particularly stark in the 40-50-year-old age group, a group particularly vulnerable to the mid-life crisis affair.

Finally, more men fear emotional intimacy more than do women. Believe it or not, some men find lovers so they can avoid any real intimacy. Emotional closeness and the expression of vulnerability that goes with it scares many men, so they distance themselves from their wives by cheating on them. At the same time,  they don’t get too emotionally involved with their lovers. This kind of “watering down of the milk” feels safer to some men.

And, why are men cheating more than ever? Like the old joke about why a dog licks his genitals, “because he can.” The biggest sexual boundary that always curbed men’s appetite for sex was a strong woman. It used to be that women provided all the sexual boundaries in our culture. Single women had far too much to lose by entering into a sexual relationship with a man who might abandon them, impregnate them, contaminate them or disgrace them. And their own wives were more protected by stronger family laws that supported divorced women with hefty alimony payments and deterred men from risking divorce. Not today. Thanks to feminism, women are expected to make their own money after divorce. And single women now own their own orgasm and a box of Trojans. So they are off to the races. With so many willing female partners to have affairs with (married and single) men have little to stop them except their own ethics.

And some men have plenty of that. One of my favorite studies linked monogamy to intelligence. The smarter the man, the more likely he is to be faithful. The researchers speculated that monogamy is an intellectual decision that rises above animal instincts and better provides for survival of offspring. Yes, kids from two parent families are likely to do better in life.

As always, my solution to bullet-proof relationships is to grow a bond through emotional intimacy. To make a relationship  rock-solid, one must move a step or two closer to the bone, and hone some relationship skills. Compassion can be learned. Fair-fighting is a skill. And stonewalling is a killer of all connection. Intimacy is not easy nor painfree. Extreme emotional intimacy and mutual care may involve squeamish feelings of shame, the forced expression of awkward words, an ability to see the ugly in others and still love them, and worse,  the ability to glaringly see the ugly in ourselves and still feel lovable. But the pay-back is pure kryptonite. An I’ve-got-your-back-if-you’ve-got-mine emotional contract that can make your relationship affair-proof.


What Does Your “Mom Hair” Reveal? Efficiency or Depression?

Saturday, April 3rd, 2010

We all know the famous new-Mom hair cut. Yep. That’s me with my oldest at her third birthday party. When she was born, I got myself a short, low-maintenance pixie cut that allowed me to reduce my preening time and increase my diaper changing time. I even went one step further than a simple cut and sacrificed my blonde locks for my natural brunette base, thus saving time and money in a colorist’s chair.

There are other forms of “Mom Hair.” Consider the perma-pony tail, a look that keeps tiny hands from pulling mommy’s hair and keeps Mommy’s hands away from a blow dryer. Then there’s the all-telling baseball cap with the “MacDonald’s Employee” pony tail sticking out the back. We all know that signals a long night with a screaming teether.

But there is more than convenience and efficiency in our Mom hair doos. Hair is our most obvious signal to the world of our internal state of mind. Hair can be linked to our moods and even our sexuality. When I look back at pictures of me in my short, dark crop, I shudder with memories of postpartum depression that went undiagnosed. After baby number two, with a little help from Zoloft, I stayed with long, blonde hair. Coincidence? I think not.

Hair is linked to a woman’s sexual attractiveness, and lack of attention to hair can also signal that sexual energy is being temporarily diverted to put the baby’s needs first. The onset of motherhood can bring a shift in identity as women move from being Barbie Dolls to Betty Crockers, all on the way to becoming a fully empowered woman. (Women without children encounter a similar phenomenon as they age and sexual attractiveness becomes less important than their ability to be creative, productive, and to nurture the world.)

It’s perfectly natural for women to care less about their looks while they do the rigorous work of caring for an infant. I am less concerned about a new Mom with her hair in a frayed knot, than the “Hot Mom” who’s wearing her baby as an accessory and ignoring the fact that the babe’s sunhat has been covering her eyes for twenty minutes. Putting baby first is nature’s way.

“Mom Hair” could signal depression if it also includes a lack of hygiene and a lack of desire to primp, ever, even one-in-a-while for the man of the house. So, look closely in the mirror today. What is your hair is saying about you?