Two Faced People. Healthy or Dangerous?

BB20B5F67B8ECB312EA0F4E3595732_h296_w526_m2_bblack_q99_p99_chkxPINzvDr. Wendy Walsh: Let me start by assuring everyone of one thing. We all have two (at least) personalities, and that’s perfectly healthy. In order to survive in our very complex social system, humans learn to put on a public personality that excels at sandbox skills. It’s the face we bring to work with us. I like to call it our “performance personality.”

However, at home, we are more intimate with the natives — and our authentic self, complete with tears and tempers, is allowed to thrive. Thus, our intimate relationships are a home for the heart. It’s a place where the real “us” feels safe.

But when do these dual operating systems become dysfunctional? When is being two-faced bad? Well, our two faces become dangerous when the differences are extreme — when our morals, ethics, and boundaries completely disappear as our private personality begins to rule the roost. This can be particularly damaging to children who become very confused by witnessing two sets of values. In intimate relationships, we may have a shorter temper and more visible sadness, but we shouldn’t have completely different values. If lying and cheating is something you’d never do at work, doing those things privately can be a tragic lesson for kids.

For example, you may not exactly love your boss, but at work and at public functions, you are the picture of the perfect employee — for understandable political gain. But at home, all you do is trash your boss. What is the message to your family members? That mean gossip is okay? That your authentic feelings of hurt are less important than your desire to criticize him or her? Wouldn’t it be more helpful to children to hear a more balanced view of both your boss and you?

Another time that a performance personality can be dysfunctional is when it starts to take over at home — when some great career success comes with many accolades. Those compliments can serve toboost self-esteem — which is good — or they can serve to create falseness. In the entertainment world, when an actor suddenly has a hit movie and begins to live an unbridled life with a huge sense of entitlement, people whisper that “he believes his own press.” So, taking in compliments for your achievements is generally good, but living a false identity to match them is not.

Finally, our private, intimate personality can be dangerous too. If your private personality is more than the odd expression of anger and sorrow, and instead one of severe pain to your family members, then it’s time to get help. If your private personality is one of chronic depression, poor anger management, substance abuse, or even violence, then it’s time to drag that private self to therapy. Here’s a suggestion: Have your public self make the appointment and drive you there.

Read more: http://www.momlogic.com/2009/10/two_faced_people_when_public_and_private_personalities_are_dangerous.php#ixzz0TmcaSoNK

2 thoughts on “Two Faced People. Healthy or Dangerous?

  1. I’ve been told my intimate personality is a “severe pain” not only to my family members but to most of my friends as well. 🙂 But its obnoxious temperament seems neither derived from pain nor depression (life is pretty great). And though I perfectly understand the need for those gainfully employed or merely socially ambitious to have to wear two faces, I, through great fortune, have been able to express my authentic self in almost all circumstances. The benefit of this is a high reduction in the stress level that accompanies having two or more faces. I highly recommend it. And though great wealth/success can make this possible, it is also an option for those who realize its value and can choose a profession and/or lifestyle where a second face isn’t really necessary (an option most people fail to consider as much as I would think would benefit them). The other great second face generator is children. But while I may simplify my face for my kids at times, I, unlike many/most parents, don’t really change it (their mother doesn’t completely agree with this philosophy). I don’t censor/alter myself just because the kids won’t understand (but only when I think they will, harmfully -and that’s key-, MISUNDERSTAND). And though I am not completely alternate-face-free I generally don’t consider myself to have significant second face (though clearly a second, and perhaps even third chin). For as some one once said, “if I had a second face, do you think I’d be wearing THIS one?!”

  2. I’m not sure I followed all of this Dr. Walsh. Maybe its just a case of too many “what ifs”.

    Are you thinking that people get too connected to roles they play, worker, father/wife, partner, etc. that they lose connection with their true self? I’m not sure how that can happen as each role, as it is integrated to the whole, becomes the definition of the true self. Just like the hand is defined by the digits present (or missing), its uniqueness is defined by the sum of the parts.

    If you are saying that one part of the whole can be out of balance and should be re-aligned if it is causing physical or emotional harm to others, then I would tend to agree with you. There might be room for an argument for self-destruction as well, but often without an outside effect, measuring and recognizing emotional self destruction is tough. (i.e. without drinking, drugs, obsessions, etc, it can be difficult to determine an emotional imbalance until it triggers a “postal worker” expression)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *