Tag Archives: Romantic Attachment Style

FOR COUPLES: Do You Have Good Flights or Bad Fights?

For Couples, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dealing with abuseEver been in a passionate argument with your spouse and had the thought, “This is it. This will divorce us for sure!” Here’s a secret: Most people have those thoughts in the heat of an angry exchange, because in the regressed mental state called rage, “water under the bridge” doesn’t seem like an option. Know this: Conflict is a natural part of having an intimate relationship and even a vital part. As couples come back to each other after a fight, in a place of love with words of contrition and forgiveness, the relationship is often stronger for it. It is at least more intimate. The bumpy road of conflict followed by repair is the route to a deeper connection. After a fight, we know our partner’s hot buttons very well. And hopefully he is more understanding of our tender spots. But how can you tell if your fights are “good fights,” the kind that will eventually help you grow closer, or “bad fights”, the kind that chip away at your bond and erode your love? Certainly, some fights do function as a slow kill on your relationship.

There are some things to consider: First of all, think about the power of the words used during a fight. Yes, even though psychotherapists stress that we must use words that focus on our feelings rather than accusations, even the most educated of us resort to blaming sentences that begin with the word “YOU!” That alone doesn’t indicate a “bad fight” unless it is also followed by vicious name calling. Name calling is a bad sign. It indicates that one partner has temporarily forgotten the other’s identity and has substituted it by a skewed stereotype. It’s hard to drop those evil caricatures once our minds have created them. If you see him as a loser and tell him over and over, you are also rewiring your brain to believe this is true.

One other thing to consider is the amount of voice time alloted each arguer. If the yelling is terribly lop-sided and one partner gets more air time, then something else is going on. Either intimidation by the loud mouth, or an emotional retreat by the other. Both things are not fighting fair. As injurious as a fight can be, the biggest determinant of whether it is a “good fight” is the way repair is made afterward. There are many unique ways that couples come back into relationship after a fight. Notes left by the morning coffee pot, flowers at the office, and my favorite — off-the-charts make-up sex. But the important thing to remember is that love and respect can return.

Dangerous aftermaths include icy treatment for days on end. Little jabs thrown into unrelated conversations. Passive aggressive, retaliatory behavior. And worst of all, a fight that morphs into other fights that get flooded with material from old injuries. “Remember the time you…..”
The best way to learn to have “good fights” is to establish ground rules before any fighting begins. Men love rules of the game. It reminds them of sports and makes fighting a healthy challenge rather than a confusing battle with a scary, invisible opponent. Some ground rules might include, no name calling, no stonewalling, no fighting in front of the kids, no going to bed mad, and most importantly, scheduled make-up time the next day.

It is also important to understand that each person has their own fighting style that must be respected. A man who walks out the door for brisk walk during an argument may not be rejecting you, he may be protecting you from a shift from words to action. Some people need a time-out to regroup and think during a fight. The time to talk about fighting styles, of course, is when you are not fighting.
Arguments with someone we are deeply committed to can be very, very scary. And the outcome of a fight may not be what we bargained for, but two individual people sharing a life will have many opportunities to compromise. Remember, it’s not who wins the match that matters, it’s how the game is played. Reminding yourself that love can return is the best way to insure that you have good fights.

Watch my YOUTUBE video: How to Forgive

FOR COUPLES: Maybe it’s Your Attachment Style

For Couples, , , , , , , , ,

Couple Back to back with problemsYou may have heard about  “attachment disorders” as they pertain to babies and parents, but did you know there’s  an adult version that relates to romantic attachments? Many adults walking among us, stumble through the world of dating, mating, and relating, while reliving their own preverbal, infantile emotional injuries. Some have a style of attachment that brings as many feelings of anxiety as comfort, and they are called “anxious” attachers. To understand this, let’s take a look at what attachment theory is.

History of Attachment Theory


In this book, Becoming Attached, author Dr. Robert Karen sums up the work of the pioneers of attachment theory well. From the birth of attachment theory, with such thinkers as John Bowlby, Mary Ainsworth, and Mary Main, came the notion that a trusted person — an attachment figure — offers an infant a secure base. A child whose needs are met with appropriate attention, affection, and empathic words will grow to trust the world and to trust relationships, and will translate that feeling of trust to a romantic partner in adult life. John Bowlby, an English psychotherapist from the first part of the last century, is often called the father of attachment theory. He believed that the ties to the parent gradually weaken as the child gets older, and that the secure base function is slowly shifted to other figures, eventually resting on one’s mate.

This tendency of the child to attach in the ways he or she was attached to his/her parents happens because the functions of attachment become an internal property of the child. In other words, we are often unaware of our own attachment style. Attachment theory involves a way of relating to others based on communications and behaviors of both parents in the first years of life. These “messages” about how to love are then combined with a child’s own interactions with each parent, and become an influential cognitive structure — a hard-wired piece of our personality.

Three Principal Patterns of Attachment


Attachment researchers have categorized people based on three principal patterns of attachment. The first is a pattern of secure attachment, in which the person is confident that a parent (usually Mom, and eventually a lover) will be available, responsive, and helpful.

The second is that of anxious resistant attachment, in which the individual is uncertain if a parent will be available and because of that uncertainty, is prone to separation anxiety and is anxious about exploring the world.

The third pattern is an anxious avoidant attachment, in which the individual has no confidence that when he or she seeks care, they will be responded to, and on the contrary, expects rejection.

These three kinds of patterns play out in adult romantic life as well. It is estimated that only about 20 percent of the American population has secure attachment behaviors — the ability to give and receive care with comfort, and a degree of self-esteem that is not dependent on their lover’s reinforcement. What’s left in most of us? We either have a tendency to avoid feelings and closeness, or a confusing pattern of craving and mistrusting love — in various degrees, of course.

People with anxious attachment disorder are vigilant clock-watchers. Since they are dependent on contact and affirmation from their partner, they have an uncanny ability to sense if contact is waning. They tend to be chronic voice mail and e-mail checkers, and have a need for constant texting. They can also be easily prone to feelings of jealousy. They love and respect their partner, but are also wary that that love may disappear. And, while people with anxious attachment disorder crave closeness, they can also be surprisingly terrified when they actually get what they crave. We’ve all met or dated someone who sent us contradictory messages and led us to believe they were interested, only to disappear or behave badly and send us running. People with anxious attachment disorder don’t trust that love is real or reliable, and so they often behave badly when things feel too good.

The good news is that attachment disorders can be healed. An empathetic, ethical therapist can foster a healthy therapist/patient relationship that rebuilds adult attachment style. Patients learn how to depend on relationships, to trust love, and to tolerate criticism and consistent contact. If you feel you are suffering from an attachment disorder, try to find a therapists who specializes in attachment theory.

Attachment theory holds so many keys to adult romantic pair bonding. The unique mating dance of couples is choreographed by the internal world of both partners, creating, in the end, a performance that runs the gamut from an embracing waltz to one in which the dancers continually step on each others’ feet. It is a reflection of the secret world of an infant and parent, played out again with a grown-up body and a new kind of mother — a lover.

For more watch: If a Guy Likes Me, Why Wont He Call Back

Subscribe to my YOUTUBE channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/DrWendyWalsh/featured

The Psychology of Hooking Up

Sex

images

I have a friend named Ilana. She and I have opposing romantic attachment styles. Ilana is what many people might call independent. She has her own money, her own house, and her own rules. While she has loving, intimate relationships with men, before long, her boyfriend-du-jour starts to feel like he’s smothering her. Then she begins to describe her once heart-throb, as clingy. She says he hangs around her place too much. She asks him to go away so she can miss him. And ya know what? Rather than bolting with his tail between his legs, her sweet, hurt, puppy boyfriend usually becomes even more attentive to her needs, until she can’t take it anymore and banishes him forever. Good-bye another in a line of sweet hunks.

I’ve never met these kind of men. They apparently are not attracted to me. Or, they are invisible to me. One or the other. The men in my life follow an inconsistent advance/retreat pattern, that alternatively feels blissful and rejecting. They walk to their own testosterone drum and shower me with brief periods of love and then disappear for an indeterminate amount of time, while I drum my fingers, watch the clock, and act like I don’t care.

 

One evening Ilana and I were out doing what women do best, walking and talking. The moon was high and the Pacific ocean thundered nearby, and we were thundering on about our latest boy problems. I posed the question that maybe we deliberately choose the kind of men we choose just to act out some kind of early life conflict. Hers having to do with engulfment, mine having to do with abandonment. In other words, our very smart brains sniff out the future and we become attracted to the very thing that makes us sick. Kinda like a food allergy. We debated that idea for a while.

Then I came up with an even better theory. (Well, I came up with it late. Real researchers had already figured this out.) What if we don’t choose specific guys with some kind of chick voodoo, but instead, perceive them to be whatever we need to bitch about. In other words, what if we were both actually dating the same kind of man, yet it felt different to each of us? And better yet, what if how we behaved to this similar man, caused him to react in the exact bad way that we needed? In other words, since we expect a kind of behavior, we do whatever it takes to get him to act out what we need, even if what we seem to need, hurts us a lot. Wow. That was a brain twister. Of course, I can’t exactly prove this theory without sleeping with one of Ilana’s boyfriends, but I do have some psychological theory to prove that my hunch is accurate. It’s called attachment theory. In the next few blogs I will break down attachment theory for you, so you can see your own stories unfold as a research statistic. Stay tuned.